Talk:CUPS/GA1

GA Reassessment

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.

There has been a request for citation since August 2007.

Significant sections of the article are uncited. For instance, Compatibility, most of Red Hat Linux/Fedora, Mandrake Linux, Mac OS X, most of CUPS web-based administration interface, Backends, and most of Overview.

There are external links in the body of the text, for instance in GNOME. external links should only appear in the External links section.

There is one dead link.[1]

"One of CUPS' main advantages is that it can process a variety of data formats on the print server." One of CUPS' main advantages over what?

What are the first eight entries in Notes and References, before the citations? Further reading? If so, they should be moved to a Further reading section.

The article contains no information on the various releases.

--Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 16:49, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- As these issues have not been addressed, this article has now been delisted. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 18:47, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]