Talk:Code Reviser

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I've put the globalize tag in the page because I doubt that this position is unique to the state of Washington. 331dot (talk) 17:55, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it because, while many common law polities have revisers of code, the specific verbiage of "Code Reviser" is unique to the state of Washington. DocumentError (talk) 17:56, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, but the sidebar currently states "Code Reviser of Washington" which sounds like a good title to me. That might complement a broader article about this or other similar positions in general, which can have different names(my state of Maine calls it the Revisor of Statutes). 331dot (talk) 19:48, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I won't argue if you want to change it, however, the official name of the office is "Code Reviser" not "Code Reviser of Washington." The infobox template simply appends any official title with "of (polity)." DocumentError (talk) 21:02, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]