Talk:Coat of arms of Lithuania/Belarus RFC

RFC on Belarus Section of Coat of Arms of Lithuania

{{rfc|hist|pol}} Which of the following sections should be used in the article, Coat of arms of Lithuania? Robert McClenon (talk) 10:50, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please specify your choice in the Survey by selecting one letter indicating a section, or by selecting a first choice followed by a second choice. You may make a brief statement supporting your choice in the Survey. Do not respond to or comment on the statements of others in the Survey. The Discussion section is for discussion.

A. – Retain the existing section, Coat_of_arms_of_Lithuania#Belarus

B. – Use User:Pofka/sandbox/CoA of Lithuania: Belarus.

C. – Use User:Marcelus/sandbox6.

D. – Other (Please specify)

Survey

B. Better than A, because B shortens A and retains the main points, which are relevant to the article. B is better than C, because C erases too much information and ignores other Wikipedians' previous additions to A, as the section is entirely rewritten and core information that was there previously is ignored and removed.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:47, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

C. WP:SCOPE of the section are coats of arms similar to the coat of arms of Lithuania on the territory of Belarus. In view of this, it is necessary to remove all topics that are not directly related to this issue, and are further developed in separate articles. The section should briefly describe the history of the occurrence of Vytis/Pahonia in Belarus, with emphasis on the adoption of the coat of arms of Lithuania as the national emblem of Belarus in 1918 and the subsequent history of its use. The article is composed in such a way that the section is made up of text and a gallery of pictures illustrating it, thus the balance between the two should be maintained, and the text should be reasonably concise.Marcelus (talk) 23:54, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]