Jump to content

Talk:Civil registration

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Civil registry)

Eurocentrism

[edit]

The article states that "France was the first country to create a national Registration". This is not accurate, maybe France was the first country in Europe. China for instance had such systems established since pre-dynastic era (read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hukou#History).

In UK

[edit]

The term Civil Registry is not commonly used in Great Britain. The normal, and widely-used term is Civil Registration, where birth, marriage and deaths certificates are recorded in local registers at a local Registrar's office. While Scotland has a different historical set of operating procedures from that of England and Wales, the terminology utilised is identical in both these jurisdictions. Northern Ireland [Ulster] has had a similar history for registration, and uses much the same terminology. The Republic of Ireland, having started with a UK basis, will also, in my opinion, be using the same terminology. So, the UK and Ireland user is most likely to not be looking for a term such as Civil Registry, and instead will be looking for Civil Registration. If Civil Registry is the usual term in the USA, then perhaps the heading ought to be "Civil Registry or Civil Registration" or, putting it another way "Civil Registry/Civil Registration". Gordon Johnson 82.153.166.99 (talk) 01:39, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UK GRO now part of Passport Office

[edit]

The UK General Register Office is part of Her Majesty's Passport Office and oversees civil registration in England and Wales.

https://www.gro.gov.uk/gro/content/

Tekaham (talk) 14:34, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Civil registration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:25, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Civil registration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:46, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from Family register

[edit]

Are the Civil registration and Family register concepts different enough to merit separate articles? I wonder if the latter could just be a section in this one. I am also unsure whether e.g. the Swedish Population Register is the former or the latter. —ajf (talk) 12:52, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • ``Agree`` They are basically the same thing. To start this process please include missing info from Family register into Civil registration and any editors working on this please make sure sure article quality is maintained or improved. DownTownRich (talk) 01:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Ajfweb: Wow this is almost one year old. So they aren't quite the same thing if I'm reading this correctly: "A family register is a type of civil register..." I poked around and I think they are separate articles partly because there are a lot of family registry systems, such as koseki (Japan) or hukou (China), some of which have their own articles.
I think putting "family registration" as a subsection of "civil registration" wouldn't be an issue, as long as it doesn't make the result too long. Fredlesaltique (talk) 13:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  checkY Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 10:05, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MABIRZI KENNETH

[edit]

MABIRIZI KENNETH was born in 1997 in the ghetto of Kampala MABKEN (talk) 19:08, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]