Talk:Citico (Cherokee town)

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Appalachia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Appalachia, a collaborative effort to increase coverage of Appalachia and the Appalachian Mountains. If you would like to participate, go to the project page to see a list of related articles needing attention.AppalachiaWikipedia:WikiProject AppalachiaTemplate:WikiProject AppalachiaAppalachia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tennessee Low‑importance

	Tennessee portal Citico (Cherokee town) is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of North America Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Citico (Cherokee town) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 April 2008, and was viewed approximately 2,507 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Spanish artifacts excavated at Citico, Tennessee suggest that the historic Native American site may have been the village of "Satapo" visited by the Juan Pardo expedition in 1567?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/April.

Wikipedia

The article title

There is another "Citico" archaeological site near Chattanooga, so I extended this site's article title to distinguish it. Bms4880 (talk) 22:24, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

Request received to merge Citico (Chattanooga, Tennessee) to this article. Reason: Same location, the two archeological sites can easily be in the same article and should be. No need for a split. Discuss below. Dated October 2020. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 04:13, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - I concur with the assessment above. Both articles should be merged into one. There is enough information in both to make a better written article without making the article too large. This makes sense. --Tsistunagiska (talk) 13:11, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - The other article appears to refer to a different site. It mentions a mound along Riverside Drive in Chattanooga, which is nowhere near the subject of this article (located along the Little Tennessee River, south of modern Vonore). Are they referring to the same town? BrineStans (talk) 22:42, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I should also note their site designations are different, 40HA65 and 40MR7. BrineStans (talk) 22:46, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see the source of the confusion. A well-meaning individual added a paragraph (unsourced) confusing this site with the site in Chattanooga some years ago. I have removed it. The site at the subject of this article is nowhere near Chattanooga. BrineStans (talk) 00:51, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a source on the archaeological survey of the Chattanooga site: [1]. Page 5: "One of the towns established by the pro-British Cherokees ca. 1776, this town was destroyed by the Shelby expedition in 1779." If so, they're not the same town, as the subject of this article was detailed as early as 1725, and appears on a map in 1730. BrineStans (talk) 01:12, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn. Makes sense, thanks BrineStans. Very helpful. I struck the request. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 15:55, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, BrineStans. Should have caught the (Chattanooga, Tennessee) part of the article. Please forgive us the error. I know GenQuest has probably been doing the same as myself in spending hours researching these towns. We definitely want to make sure we are as accurate we can be. I appreciate your corrective information. --Tsistunagiska (talk) 18:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's no problem, guys. I should have caught that earlier edit to this article, which was several years ago. BrineStans (talk) 23:09, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's hard for people to follow the combined histories of multiple nations, especially when they are close together like the Creek/Cherokee/Shawnee grouping. Where their invisible borders crossed they usually lived together in communities. It's not like today where there are such hard border lines. They also swapped towns at different times. There were a few towns in the vicinity of current day Chattanooga. They would be abandoned and then repopulated multiple times. The Shawnee, Cherokee and Creeks (primarily Musckogee) regularly swapped territory all the way up to the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Then the Removal occurred and you see how their relationships back in the east directly tied to their relationships in Indian Territory. The Cherokee, Musckogee and Shawnee settled very close together and intermingled just as they did in the east.--Tsistunagiska (talk) 14:12, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fiddle tune by the same name

Should we add the fact that there is a traditional Appalachian fiddle tune named "Citico"? 98.123.38.211 (talk) 16:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]