Talk:Cirencester Deer Park School

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gloucestershire Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gloucestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gloucestershire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GloucestershireWikipedia:WikiProject GloucestershireTemplate:WikiProject GloucestershireWikiProject Gloucestershire articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Generally regarded as the best school in Cirencester?

Deer Park and Kingshill are both highly rated schools. Which is the better is a matter of opinion as there is no clear evidence either way. GCSE results. In 2004 and 2006 Deer Park exceeded Kingshill in terms of % of students achieving A* to C. In 2005 and in 2007 Kingshill beat Deer Park. see BBC website Contextual Value added. Raw GCSE results are sometimes seen as unfair as they penalise schools with a less able intake. CVA scores in 2006 were 1007.3 for Deer Park and 1009.1 for Kingshill. Kingshill did slightly better but as I have indicated got slightly worse GCSE results.see BBC website Ofsted. Deer Park was rated as a good school with outstanding features on the last Ofsted inspection in 2006. Kingshill recently was inspected and although the report is unpublished as yet, it scored outstanding in every category. All this is a bit anal I know, but what it does show is that Cirencester has two excellent schools and neither should be listed as better than the other. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Torp101 (talk • contribs) 17:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]