Talk:Christoph Bartholomäus Anton Migazzi
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Christoph Bartholomäus Anton Migazzi article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Name
[edit]"Count Christoph Cardinal Anton Migazzi" is a completely nonsensical sequence of names. The "Cardinal" cannot be put between two first names.--194.166.46.194 (talk) 20:52, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
We meet again, Gnome. Your revision has been reverted. There may be concern over WP:POV with phrasing, as the author often characterizes the subject in flattering terms, but I believe this to be his or her way of paying homage and it makes the article a good read. Have you found evidence of original research? - Conservatrix (talk) 18:39, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
I had requested your review of this page and here result as an obstacle. Would it be possible to mantain the original style while accommodating your changes? - Conservatrix (talk) 19:51, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Greetings. I had removed most of the wording that qualifies, judges, assesses of characterizes. We cannot say "XYZ was a good Christian" or "ABC was very fond of XYZ" unless we can cite a source that says so. Otherwise, we have pure, unadulterated personal opinions that are essentially our own, original work. Without references, the article reads as simply promotional, acolyte material. That's the gist of it. Take care. -The Gnome (talk) 11:09, 17 March 2018 (UTC)