Talk:Christine Terhune Herrick

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 June 2010. The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nom.

Notability tag

I removed the tag because "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article." Two obits satisfies that, if disagree take it to AFD. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 05:59, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I also added a citation by the NYT reviewing one of her books. Clearly a notable author. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 06:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Given the AfD discussion (see the box above) and the new sources which showed up, I see no need for the tag. Gwen Gale (talk) 12:42, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]