Talk:China Western Development
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jtong95.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:28, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Untitled
[edit]The colours on the map are incorrect: "Revitalize Northeast China" relates to, of course, the northeast provinces including Jilin, but currently have the colour of the eastern provinces. And vice versa. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.2.78.135 (talk) 13:28, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
The final sentence of the first paragraph is inflammatory, suggesting the program is exploiting people, neutrality needs to be maintained. Also referring to the Xinjiang region as East Turkestan is not appropriate. I have therefore edited that. Discussion needs to be had over changing the sentence as a whole. Ksood91 (talk) 13:48, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:China Western Development/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| Comment(s) | Press [show] to view → |
|---|---|
| "This region contains 71.4% of mainland China's area, but only 28.8% of its population, as of the end of 2002, and 16.8% of its total economic output, as of 2003." --Does anyone know the source for these numbers?
"China's western regions have reported an annual average economic growth rate of 10.6% for six years in a row. "--Again what is the source for this information? And what 6 years are being referred to? Can someone please send this information to me? I have been looking everywhere online and cannot find it.Ggilrea1 (talk) 12:13, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
And I am interested about this part in the article "There are minor side benefits, of course, but if it continues Tibetans will become a completely insignificant minority increasingly marginalized."", because the Tibet article says, that the Han chinese population in Tibet is at about 6,1 % of the hole population, so is it possible to say, that tibetans are a minority, if they are more than 90% of the population? (and the "of course" part is also questionable!) --Nsae Comp (talk) 07:51, 6 June 2008 (UTC) This article turns into a pro-tibet rant at the end, which is unacceptable. Political propaganda deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vlad Dracula (talk • contribs) 02:28, 9 June 2008 (UTC) There are SERIOUS problems with this page, which is surprising for such an important topic. Parts if it are even nonsensical. Someone please take the time to do a proper writeup, and correct some of the asinine vocabulary and imprecise/unsubstantiated statements. If I had time I would. This is an embarrassment for Wikipedia, especially for such an important topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.177.114.12 (talk) 13:21, 10 May 2013 (UTC) | |
Last edited at 13:22, 10 May 2013 (UTC). Substituted at 11:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on China Western Development. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100302172353/http://rss.xinhuanet.com/newsc/english/2008-06/21/content_8413779.htm to http://rss.xinhuanet.com/newsc/english/2008-06/21/content_8413779.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:49, 5 August 2017 (UTC)