Talk:Chaos (2005 action film)

Untitled

As this film has not yet been released on DVD, and as there have been no announcements that it is going direct-to-video (it was a surprise to the producer’s assistant when I asked her) I feel this statement needs to be revised.

Can anyone give a date of when it will be released? This is the most info I have found on this film.

The above comment is outdated-- the movie is now out on DVD. Migp (talk) 06:29, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chaos (2006 film) poster.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Chaos (2006 film) poster.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 17 September 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:32, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Chaos (2005 Capitol film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.imdb.com/news/sb/2002-06-06
Corrected formatting/usage for http://business.highbeam.com/2012/article-1G1-68663518/franchise-intertainment-duel
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150404174905/http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/chaos2005.php to http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/chaos2005.php
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150404210853/http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/chaosbluray.php to http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/chaosbluray.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 August 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved(closed by non-admin page mover) Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 15:54, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

– While the usual first line of disambiguation when two films of the same title are released in the same year is by country, that doesn't work in this instance as the "Capitol" film was a multi-country coproduction (and one of the participating countries was the same country as the Dominion film). But disambiguating them by distributor is opaque to the reader, because this is fairly obscure insider information that audiences mostly don't memorize or even particularly care all that strongly about. But since the films were of different genres, and that's information that a reader is much likelier to already know about a film they're looking for an article about, genre should be the preferred disambiguator here. Also, going back in the page histories to determine how and why they were dabbed this way in the first place, it was on a bad analogy to two Aladdin films that were both animated, so genre still didn't work, and which were then dabbed by studio (with one of the studios being Disney, which is a universally recognized distinction marker in its own right, in a way that "Capitol" and "Dominion" aren't — you know whether an animated film is Disney or not-Disney!) rather than by distributor. Bearcat (talk) 20:36, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support 100% per nom. Readers are more likely to know a film's genre than the company that made it. Paintspot Infez (talk) 23:37, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - listing the distributors in the articles' titles is confusing, as readers might presume both dominion and capit[a]l to be adjectives --Jonie148 (talk) 06:41, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.