Talk:Changzhou

China High‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities Start‑class

	Cities portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 January 2019 and 8 March 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ZhiZhi Xu. Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:10, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 September 2022 and 8 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BU Qi Xue (article contribs). — Assignment last updated by BU Qi Xue (talk) 04:14, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Changzhou

The map shown on the right is Changzhou written with a 長, not a 常. Don't use it for discussion of this completely different city. — LlywelynII 13:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

Up to you guys if you're going to expand things yourself, but right now the ton of forced empty space is an eyesore. If it's still like that when you read this, future editor, come back and restore the version I did yesterday which looked much better for the current amount of content. — LlywelynII 05:27, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]