Jump to content

Talk:Chandelier (song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Another music video?

[edit]
I saw a different video (from YouTube, I believe). The video had the wig inpersonating Sia, wondering around and drinking with the lyrics. Is that an official video since there is no mention of it? Is there such thing as YouTube-only video? 82.141.95.243 (talk) 05:59, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This video (unlike the official video) represents the story of the song. Jim Michael (talk) 21:22, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]

--Another Believer (Talk) 15:34, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • You may have noticed that in many music charts this song was in the first place! Worth mentioning and it is...

Music video

[edit]

Yes theres a problem: the descriptiion of the video is misleading. The dancer is not in an empty room, she passes through a three room flat, furnished sparsely. The signs of life are the telephone and four coasters on the coffee table , masses of notes 'n drawings on the refrigerator, and artwork on the bedroom walls,especially two portraits of depressed people.This is the result of excess drinking.Maddie the dancer does not try to hide in the thin, unlined drapes, she comforts herself for a moment. She is a strong and carefull dancer; note despite playful exuberance every major move falls exactly on the beat of the music.Oba Devi (talk) 21:36, 20 June 2014 (UTC)Oba Devi[reply]

"deserted" does not mean "empty", it means that the room does not have any people, but only the dancer. Simon (talk) 02:28, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with the New York magazine quote

[edit]

This portion "The dancing was quite odd, but Maddie made it look good. If I ever did it, people would laugh so hard! Maddie is representing a young Sia. When Sia was little, she was kind of antisocial, and this video basically represented her." Isn't coming from Maddie, it's referring to her, and isn't in the article that the first part of the quote is from. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.0.225.85 (talk) 02:25, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"works done by"

[edit]

Re "works done by Rihanna," done = sung? And/or written? (Just flagging for clarification.) --Chriswaterguy talk 15:04, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Chandelier (Sia song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Denmark sales of Chandelier is listed at 2,600,000, while total sales in the United States is 3,000,000. One of these figures must be misquote. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.211.87.241 (talk) 20:51, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Chandelier (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:42, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Chandelier (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:18, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chandelier (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:50, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy

[edit]

Couldn't this page use a "Controversy" section? Even without looking, I'm sure people have criticizing the video for being lightly veiled child porn. Hagiography is not NPOV, you know? -- Doom (talk) 22:50, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Standalone controversy sections are frowned upon, but I'm surprised there's not much mention of it at all in this article. >> Lil-unique1 (talk)20:05, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]