Talk:Central Atlas Tamazight/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ·Maunus·ƛ· 09:26, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well-written:

Much better prose than the last time around. Still some minor issue with jargon that will probably be an issue if it goes to FA - but not here.

2. Factually accurate and verifiable:

Very well referenced.

3. Broad in its coverage:

Very broad.

4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias.

Definitely neutral.

5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day-to-day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

No disputes.

6. Illustrated, if possible, by images:

Yes.

The article has improved greatly since the last review and I am glad to pass it as a GA.·Maunus·ƛ· 09:26, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]