Talk:Cell therapy

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

=planned overhaul

Untitled

This page is due for a major overhaul and I plan to start soon. However, it is mis-classified and should belong to the Medicine/Molecular and Cell Biology Projects, not to Health and Fitness. As a new user, I don't know how to get this re-classified? Distshore78 (talk) 14:50, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All you need to do is change the template. I have already done it so you can see what I mean by changing the template. Sumsum2010·T·C·Review me! 20:59, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

problems

Hi. I find that your article on cell therapy to be extremely bias and one sided, particularly under 'alternative/animal-based cell therapy' sub-heading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.164.186.175 (talk) 03:00, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your comment but they are too general to be useful. what exactly do you see as the problem? Jytdog (talk) 12:05, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Page correction and restructure needed

Hello. I would like to re-structure this page. It contains out of date information, some citations are not working and it is based around a concept that is out of date and not officially recognised. Specifically: Main reference and concept (duality between human and animal for instance) is out of date and not really relevant to contemporary applications of cell therapy. The first citation does not mention cell therapy, and there is no further link to cell therapy in the website provided. To the best of my knowledge, there is no official "alternative medicine cell therapy" reliable source, and it personally seems not to add anything to the content of the page. Quackwatch can't be considered a reliable source of information. The Quackwatch link provided is out of date (2003), full of inaccuracies and makes a huge confusion between "regular", medically approved cell therapy and this so-called animal-based one. I suggest this section is not relevant to the article and creates confusion between a sound medical approach and a controversial, unverified treatment. I would personally remove it.

I would like to edit the structure it and add sections on specific examples of cell therapy. Please refer to [sandbox] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bcarbone (talk • contribs) 15:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC) Apologies, added signature Bcarbone (talk) 15:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of Western Ontario supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:25, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]