Jump to content

Talk:Caterham 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Caterham Seven)

CSR?

[edit]

The article states that the CSR is based on the SV chassis. This is surely wrong; the CSR chassis is completely different, with IRS and so on. Stephen Grant 15:46, 29 December 2006 (UTC) Stephen Grant[reply]

Stephe, yes, absolutely, the CSR chassis has the wide body dimensions but is different in many ways. However, I suppose it's arguable that it is 'based' on the SV chassis.

I added a few headings to try to make the article more structured and also started filling out the current range details. Stephen Grant 16:04, 29 December 2006 (UTC)Stephen Grant nike ta mere[reply]

Various

[edit]

I removed some of the more non-enclyopedic information (which is the best engine, etc.,etc.) I hope no-one objects. Stephen Grant 16:18, 1 January 2007 (UTC)Stephen Grant[reply]

I've started filling in detail concerning the history of the range. I apologise for any factual errors and assume that someone will be along shortly to correct them. Stephen Grant 18:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC)Stephen Grant[reply]

Added a very very basic "Racing" section, with info that others have already put in there. Needs lots of fleshing out. 89.241.205.182 20:36, 1 January 2007 (UTC)Stephen Grant[reply]

Added a "chassis and suspension" section with some basic information. Stephen Grant 19:58, 2 January 2007 (UTC)Stephen Grant[reply]

Added some detail to the "current range" section. Stephen Grant 16:58, 5 January 2007 (UTC)Stephen Grant[reply]

Did some minor editing to reflect the (largely complete) move from k-series to Ford engines, and the launch of the new R500. Stephen Grant —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephen Grant (talk • contribs) 13:55, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

16th September 2008. Apologies to whoever posted the photo in the 'Suspension and Chassis' section. I removed it because that isn't a photo of a Caterham; it's some other 7 derivative. No offense intended. stephen —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephen Grant (talk • contribs) 11:25, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Literature

[edit]

I suggest that the literature section ought to have less prominence. Perhaps a downgrade to a 'further reading' section would be most appropriate. 31.53.4.157 (talk) 20:47, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hagiographic

[edit]

Some of the text reads like a boastful company brochure. Eg : "Chapman, a Royal Air Force pilot.... After the war, Chapman became a highly successful race driver"

Chapman was without doubt an extraordinary man, but his own wiki page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colin_Chapman) shows that these statements are exaggerated. He was very briefly in the RAF, but not during the war. His record as a racing driver was not remarkable or "highly successful". He was a magnificent designer and entrepreneur, surely the bare truth is sufficient? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.100.251.189 (talk) 20:17, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seven 360, 480

[edit]

These are now available, but not fully assembled.

Fully Assembled

[edit]

It looks like none are fully assembled.

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Caterham 7. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Caterham 7. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:58, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Caterham 7. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:27, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Caterham 7. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:35, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Caterham_7&oldid=1200700513"