Talk:Cisco Catalyst 6500

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.

Telecommunications

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

comments

You should take the 'We' stuff out. Otherwise it is simply a cisco marketing slide.this is an encyclopedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.20.221.71 (talk • contribs) 14:21, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

^^ It's an encyclopedia anyone's free to edit, so feel free to do so if you're upset by it. --Mattsday 01:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What're peoples thoughts about the 'power supply inefficiencies'? Seems a bit of competitive FUD to me - the documents read more like sales pitches. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.103.25.233 (talk) 18:57, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page title

Why is the title 'Catalyst 6500' and not 'Cisco Catalyst 6500'. The page for Cisco Catalyst 1900 uses 'Cisco'. There should be consistency. FordneyPachelbel (talk) 20:07, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 18 August 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved, as there has been no opposition since the proposed move. It adheres to the common name of the product and better aligns with other Cisco page names. (non-admin closure) Hey man im josh (talk) 17:02, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Catalyst 6500 → Cisco Catalyst 6500 – I've seen both in use for this article subject (WP:COMMONNAME). Renaming would support WP:CONSISTENT, and renaming could make this a bit less ambiguous. The references in article all say "Cisco Catalyst 6500" in title. For some weight, Network Computing uses both "Cisco Catalyst 6800", "Catalyst 6800" and "Catalyst 6500" in context (usually only saying "Cisco" once).^[1] Additionally, the main English Wikipedia article is currently named Cisco Catalyst. 84.250.14.116 (talk) 09:50, 18 August 2022 (UTC); edited 09:57, 18 August 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 10:41, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There was also a discussion in 2011 to move Catalyst (switch) → Cisco Catalyst. As a result, it was moved.^[2] 84.250.14.116 (talk) 10:05, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Banks, Ethan. "Cisco Catalyst 6800: Same Game, New Name". Network Computing. Retrieved 18 August 2022.
^ Special:Permalink/425538443#Requested move

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

[1] Banks, Ethan. "Cisco Catalyst 6800: Same Game, New Name". Network Computing. Retrieved 18 August 2022.

[2] Special:Permalink/425538443#Requested move

[1]

[2]