Talk:Evoke plc

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

British Empire Low‑importance

	British Empire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

British Overseas Territories Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Overseas Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Overseas Territories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British Overseas TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesBritish Overseas Territories articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gibraltar Low‑importance

	Gibraltar portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gibraltar, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gibraltar and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GibraltarWikipedia:WikiProject GibraltarTemplate:WikiProject GibraltarGibraltar articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Gambling Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

888casino was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 18 September 2017 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Evoke plc. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Spam Magnet

User:2005 -- The spam-magnet nature of Cassava's affiliate programs surely deserves mention. This article itself was just vandalized by an affiliate hoping to capture traffic for their account by placing their affiliate information into all of the outgoing URLs. I know of at least one blog which has blocked the specific string 'pacific poker' in comments and trackbacks specifically due to the overwhelming about of spam from affiliates hoping to cash in. Isn't it relevant to the article to mention this? --Stephen Deken 04:10, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I can't imagine what you are thinking here. They have an affiliate program. Some people spam involving it. So? That is the case with any affiliate program where there is money to be made, and certainly not news nor a reason to specifically mention in this article compared to any other. 2005 06:19, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I had mentioned it at all was to clarify that it is not Cassava doing the spamming, but third-party affiliates. I've had to clarify that in the past for people who thought that Cassava was directly encouraging people to spam. --Stephen Deken 14:59, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

But again there is nothing unique about the situation. It's like saying they breathe. Any affiliate program has affiliates spamming. 2005 20:42, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not to belabor the point, but then why is there vastly less spam for, say, Amazon.com's affiliate program? --Stephen Deken 01:10, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It is belaboring the point, but Amazon's program has massive amounts of spam and "near spam" as all those junk copied datafeed sites are spam of a kind. More to answer your question though, there is more money in gambling affliate programs by far so of course there is more spam. 2005 07:47, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Good enough for me. Thanks. --Stephen Deken 13:20, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Adware nature

Why is there no mention in this article about their underhand advertising methods. For example - this company has pop-ups on untrustworthy sites, all of their websites try to get users to download software, the website makes your browser window full screen and users cannot go back out of their websites without another pop up window. Someone needs to write something about their underhand behaviour.

All that is common on the Internet, and hardly more than extreme trivia. The article isn't about the html on their websites. (And what does any of this have to do with "adware"?) 2005 19:39, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Defamation and article protection

I've seen IP addresses adding unsourced allegations about unfair practices by one of their poker sites. Unless sources are provided—secondary sources like media coverage—the information cannot remain in the article.

Because it's being added by multiple IP addresses, I have semi-protected the article. —C.Fred (talk) 15:42, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it was getting a bit ridiculous. --Gibmetal 77 ^talk 17:04, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed move to 888 Holdings

It would be logical to move this whole article so the title becomes 888 Holdings. If anyone has any objections please advise. Dormskirk (talk) 21:08, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Originally in an afd discussing the various arms of this company it was put here, but 888 Holdings seems much better to me. 2005 (talk) 21:39, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I too agree with moving to 888 Holdings. Rray (talk) 13:56, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is the official name of this company? Is there some confusion? I can't recall from/find the afd debate ♣♦ SmartGuy ♥♠ (talk) 15:36, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

888 Holdings is the official name of the publically traded company. Cassava is the majority owner of the company (the previous ownership group kept control when it went public), at least that is my understanding. I can understand the logic of having Cassava as the article, but 888 Holdings is more consistent with the structure we have, and also the listed on the London stock exchange category. 2005 (talk) 21:17, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I have moved the text over to 888 Holdings (I could not do a straight forward move as 888 Holdings already had a history). Please can someone do a history merge. Dormskirk (talk) 22:46, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am undoing the move, as the text there was only redirects. —C.Fred (talk) 23:43, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move completed, but Dormskirk's follow-on edits are hiding from me. —C.Fred (talk) 23:48, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. —C.Fred (talk) 23:52, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Links to 888 Products

Hi, Do you think it would be useful to add external links to 888.com products that are mentioned in the article such as www.888.com, www.pacificpoker.com, www.888ladies.com and www.888sport.com? --Orisen (talk) 10:13, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A laundry list of links to all their products is not needed, but a link to their main consumer site should be there and it links to all the others. 2005 (talk) 11:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the 888.com domain has been added to the spam blacklist for repeated spamming all over the place, so the corporate site will have to do. 2005 (talk) 11:58, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on 888 Holdings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080410180505/http://www.888holdingsplc.com:80/investor_relations/shareholder_info/shareholders.asp to http://www.888holdingsplc.com/investor_relations/shareholder_info/shareholders.asp
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.forbes.com/business/feeds/afx/2006/10/02/afx3058492.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:34, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gibraltar ???

It is obvious that no top management member, and none of the important facilities is located or acting from Gibraltar, which is needed in order to define this location as the Headquarters. I suggest to delete the headquarters from the template. Any objections (or other suggestions how to deal with this case)? Orielno (talk) 04:24, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 888 Holdings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:56, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 888 Holdings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:14, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Changes

Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented.

We work with 888 Holdings plc to support on corporate communications. We have some suggested changes below.

Descriptor: 888 Holdings plc is not commonly known as 888.com as this is not a brand. Replace "888 Holdings plc, known commonly as 888.com, is a public company which owns several popular gambling brands and websites" with "888 Holdings plc is a public company which owns several popular gambling brands and websites, including 888sport, 888casino and 888poker."

Factbox: Replace "Brian Mattingley" as Chairman within Key People with "Lord Jonathan Mendelsohn" as Chairman (Source: https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/888/directorate-change/14885302) Replace "Website: 888holdingsplc.com" with "www.corporate.888.com" Add "SI Sportsbook" to "brands" section (Source: https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/888/u-s-partnership-with-sports-illustrated/15030524; https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/888/si-sportsbook-launches-in-colorado/15125093) Remove: "Trade name: 888.com". Replace with "888 Holdings plc"

History: Add new section called: Partnership with Sports Illustrated Include the following text: In June 2021, 888 announced a partnership with Authentic Brands Group, owners of Sports Illustrated, to develop Sports Illustrated online sports betting and iGaming products in the United States. In September 2021, SI Sportsbook launched in Colorado. (Source: https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/888/u-s-partnership-with-sports-illustrated/15030524; https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/888/si-sportsbook-launches-in-colorado/15125093)

Brands: 888casino Include: In July 2019, 888casino was named Operator of the Year at EGR Operator Awards 2019. (Source: https://www.irishpost.com/entertainment/888casino-wins-egr-award-operator-year-173547)

Senior management and financial: Add new line with: On 3 March 2021, 888 Holdings appointed Lord Jonathan Mendelsohn as Chairman. (Source: https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/888/directorate-change/14885302) ~~: Not done: Poor formatting: I don't understand what to implement for this ER. Quetstar (talk) 18:59, 14 October 2021 (UTC)~~[reply]

Partly done: Hi. Thank you for your request. I couldn't add the Partnership bit due to the fact there are no secondary sources. Please request this again if you can provide them. The award wasn't added either due to lack of notability. Finally, the website in the infobox cannot be changed at this time given there's a Wikipedia-wide blacklist for the 888.com URL. I have never requested a delisting, but in this case I don't think it would be successful given the propensity these links would continue to be used for spamming. PK650 (talk) 22:42, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]