Talk:Carl Au/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 21:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I should be able to respond in reasonably time. Soaper1234 - talk 22:32, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Some Dude From North Carolina: Due to some unforeseen computer issues, I've not been able to respond as quickly as I would have liked. However, I'll try to respond in the next couple of days. I also have a couple bits of information to add to the article, as well as the recommendations below. Soaper1234 - talk 22:46, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Actual birthdate seems like a requirement for GA.
- Done some digging and found it. Soaper1234 - talk 12:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Add commas after "dancer" and Ostrich Boys.
- Done Soaper1234 - talk 12:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"began" → "begun"
- Done Soaper1234 - talk 12:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Early life

"graduated ~~from~~ in 2008"
- Done Soaper1234 - talk 12:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Career

Remove the comma after "Pet Shop Boys dancers".
- Done Soaper1234 - talk 12:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"from May" → "in May"
- Done Soaper1234 - talk 12:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"in new play" → "in the play"
- Done Soaper1234 - talk 12:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"guest starred" → "guest-starred"
- Done Soaper1234 - talk 12:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Filmography

Knowing each role also feels like a requirement.
- Is this in response to the Copperfield role? If so, it can be removed. Soaper1234 - talk 12:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Awards and nominations

Since there's only one award I would remove the "Work" column, at least for now.
- Done Soaper1234 - talk 12:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

Archive all archivable sources (either manually or with this tool).
- Done Soaper1234 - talk 12:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·