Jump to content

Talk:Carl Au

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Carl Au/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 21:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I should be able to respond in reasonably time. Soaper1234 - talk 22:32, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Some Dude From North Carolina: Due to some unforeseen computer issues, I've not been able to respond as quickly as I would have liked. However, I'll try to respond in the next couple of days. I also have a couple bits of information to add to the article, as well as the recommendations below. Soaper1234 - talk 22:46, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

[edit]

Early life

[edit]

Career

[edit]

Filmography

[edit]

Awards and nominations

[edit]

References

[edit]


Progress

[edit]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk14:19, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Soaper1234 (talk). Self-nominated at 15:19, 21 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: No - The fact that Au was the inaugural recipient of the prize doesn't seem to be cited.
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Mostly looks good, just one issue. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 06:04, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for the review Mx. Granger. The best I can find to say it was the first ceremony is by using the source provided. When you hover over the SSSSPOTY tab, it lists all the ceremonies, with 2007 being the first. If you don't deem this good enough, I can reword the hook. Soaper1234 - talk 18:23, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, that seems fine to me. I'll add that citation to the lead to satisfy the requirement that the hook be cited inline. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 18:25, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]