Talk:CaptainSparklez/GA2

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: NegativeMP1 (talk · contribs) 21:11, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Will be doing this review. My first comment is that it appears the article has addressed all concerns that were brought up during the first review before it entered limbo state. As such, I don't think this review will take too long and will likely be fairly short, as several concerns were already addressed. Nonetheless, I'll take my own look at this shortly. NegativeMP1 21:11, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. I'm also really sorry for the wait on Otxo. — VORTEX³⁴²⁷ (Talk!) 04:19, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

You're good, we all get busy sometimes and I've had to wait longer before. I will say that I did find it somewhat funny that right after setting my Discord nickname to track my GANs, where I set it to 1, it went down to 0 less than a couple hours later. Anyways, onto the review: it's short. NegativeMP1 05:53, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

General criteria

• No cleanup banners or in-line tags.
• No copyright violations.

• The article is well written with no apparent grammar issues that I noticed. Any general audience could likely understand the article.
• The references I checked properly sourced the text they were attributed to. I didn't check absolutely every single reference, but the ones I did pass verification.
• The article is broad in its coverage, covering all aspects that I could see a general viewer expecting from an article about Maron.
• The text appears to be neutral without any undue weight.
• No edit warring to be seen, the article appears to be stable.
• Proper illustrated by images where appropriate, with proper captions.
  • Add alt text to the images.
  • I think the rationale on the Revenge screenshot should be expanded upon to elaborate that Revenge received a Guinness World Record to possibly try and justify fair use a bit more.

Two things. I was only able to find two issues with the article at all that could prevent it from being a GA. I will say that I am slightly disappointed in the lack of material for the Personal life section, but I don't think anything can be done about that. That's definitely a recommendation though if there is any material out there, though not required for this and my assumption is you've probably already tried based on how long you've been working on this. Not going to put this on hold since it's quite literally only two things. NegativeMP1 05:53, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Actually I'll put this hold on anyways so it notifies you. NegativeMP1 00:07, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

@NegativeMP1  Done. — VORTEX³⁴²⁷ (Talk!) 06:15, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Alright, we're good. Pass, good job.  Done NegativeMP1 23:47, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.