Talk:Capital punishment in Taiwan

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Capital punishment in Taiwan article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Taiwan Start‑class High‑importance

	Taiwan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Correction and Detention Facilities (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Correction and Detention Facilities, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Correction and Detention FacilitiesWikipedia:WikiProject Correction and Detention FacilitiesTemplate:WikiProject Correction and Detention FacilitiesCorrection and Detention Facilities articles

Death Start‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Enforcement

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Comments

In Taiwan, the Minister of Justice can not ask for a retrial. Only the Solicitor General can. It is common that with the blessing from the Minister of Justice, the Solicitor General would, for one case, file special appeals several times. However, Minister can not argue the case in court.Chcyang

new government

"These conditions may remain in effect until Chen Shui-bian's tenure expires on May 20, 2008." - anyone knows the new government's position? --219.84.119.55 (talk) 15:00, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs to be updated badly.

Chen Shui-bian is no longer even president. What is the new president's position? —Preceding unsigned comment added by E3323 (talk • contribs) 11:22, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tortured English needs editing

The writing in the sections "Temporary Moratorium between 2006 and 2009" and "Execution Resumed" is very confusing and difficult to read. It really needs some editing to make it readable. Also the dates of the unofficial moratorium need to be made clearer. Davidreid (talk) 13:06, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested Move

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. per common name argument below. --regentspark (comment) 03:07, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Capital punishment in the Republic of China → Capital punishment in Taiwan – I propose to rename this article to Capital punishment in Taiwan to fit in with other articles about Taiwan.C. 22468 Talk to me 15:37, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support - No reason for it to be inconsistent with the Taiwan article. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 06:41, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. mgeo talk 22:58, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Articles that deal exclusively with the actions of the government of Taiwan should use "Republic of China". Readin (talk) 18:36, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Readin. Brain-dead consistency with a parent article is not policy and a null/void argument when dealing with intricately complex issues such as this. GotR ^Talk 19:42, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Brain-dead - and ultimately confusing - inconsistency with parent articles isn't policy either. Presumption must be in favour of moves to the common, accurate and clear use of "Taiwan" for primarily "present day"-focused articles such as this, with the onus on those supporting exemptions for inconsistency to offer specific reasons in each case. None have been given so far .. N-HH talk/edits 20:40, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Readin. It is the government - Wikipedia is not here to be politically correct, but accurate. GregJackP Boomer! 03:39, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support per MQ and N-HH. --BDD (talk) 20:23, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support per the country article's name and WP:COMMONNAME. Timrollpickering (talk) 18:40, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Capital punishment in Taiwan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100503015850/http://tw.nextmedia.com:80/applenews/article/art_id/32479844/IssueID/20100501 to http://tw.nextmedia.com/applenews/article/art_id/32479844/IssueID/20100501

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:09, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete section: Religious attitudes

According to Wikipedia's "Buddhism in Taiwan" article, Taiwan has at least 4 major Buddhist authorities. Only one of those is represented here - and the link to the cited source for that one is dead. Also , according to Wikipedia's "Religion in Taiwan" article, Buddhism is practiced by 35% of the population. Other religions include Taoism (33%) and Christianity (3.9%). Need to discuss attitudes of these also (or change the title from "Religious attitudes" to "Buddhist attitudes"). --Zahzuhzaz (talk) 12:51, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added views of 2 more Buddhist authorities. For Fo Guang view, replaced dead link to Chinese source with live link to English source. Removed unsourced anecdotes from Buddhist sutras as irrelevant - the topic is not what scriptures say, but Buddhist views of capital punishment. It is evident that different masters can use the same teachings to support different views! Still need Taoist and Christian views. --Zahzuhzaz (talk) 17:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Capital punishment in Taiwan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Capital punishment in Taiwan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:39, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What's the point of the "Executions Recommended" section?

The "Executions Recommended" sections seems pointless to me. It barely has content, and I believe the little content it does have could be merged into the sections above it. Overall, I am in favour of removing the "Executions Recommended" sections, because it has no purpose, and even if it does, the purpose would already be covered by the sections above it anyway. --KingErikII (Talk page) 07:55, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]