Jump to content

Talk:Canticle I: My beloved is mine and I am his

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Z1720 talk 21:43, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(
)

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 21:43, 11 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Canticle I: My beloved is mine and I am his; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • Proposing possible alternative hooks, will leave the final choice in hook to the reviewer:
ALT1 ... that the piano accompaniment of Benjamin Britten's Canticle I: My beloved is mine and I am his has been compared to waves at a shore?
ALT2 ... that Benjamin Britten's 1947 work Canticle I: My beloved is mine and I am his has been praised for bravely expressing same-sex love when it was dangerous to do so?
Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 03:46, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the offers, trying to be brief.
  • ALT1 is something that could be said about estimated 50 other pieces, and the sentence doesn't even mention what kind of music it is, could be a piano quintet, let alone explain why Canticle.
  • ALT2 is the opinion of this reviewer (and others), so would have to be marked as later interpretation. Further issues:
    • it misses the name of Peter Pears, which to mention seems only fair, + it is known.
    • Britten did a lot lot to "hide" the expression, by using text based on the bible, and the double meaning doesn't come across.
    • Why "work" and not saying precisely what it is, - we may have readers who don't even know that Britten was a composer.
At this point, I'd prefer ALT0 which is strictly factual, has Pears and tenor, and explains Canticle by mentioning Song of Songs. I believe that the title is interesting enough not to need extra hookiness. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:00, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
shortened ALT0a: ... that Canticle I: My beloved is mine and I am his was written by Benjamin Britten for the tenor voice of Peter Pears, setting the poetry Divine Rapture by Francis Quarles? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:03, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Will review. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 16:44, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Prefer ALT0, but ALTs 1 and 2 meet the criteria as well- nominator preferred ALT 0 MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 16:44, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, MyCatIsAChonk! I thought I put enough in quotation marks of the ref, - what do you see? Help in rewording is appreciated if needed, - it's a touchy topic, and I'm afraid to miss the meaning. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:58, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Gerda Arendt, the quotes are just fine- I was referring to unquoted material that could easily be rephrased to not match any source. For example, "...Central Hall, Westminster, on 1 November 1947 as part of a memorial concert for Dick Sheppard, founder of the Peace Pledge Union..." is pulled directly from https://brittenpearsarts.org/news/7-canticle-i-my-beloved-is-mine. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 18:24, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please check, I tried to rephrase. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:06, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All good now. Hope you can get it to run on the 22nd! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 20:59, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting to Queue 2 per WT:DYK discussion. Hook was reviewed by myself and @AirshipJungleman29:. Z1720 (talk) 21:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Canticle_I:_My_beloved_is_mine_and_I_am_his&oldid=1206535049"