Talk:Canet gun

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / Technology / Weaponry

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

"112cm"?

I am highly dubious of the claim that the Japanese cruisers were given "112cm guns". That's a bore of over 44 inches diameter. The shells for such a monster would weigh far more than the weights quoted; we'd be talking thousands of kilograms, 10,000+ pounds. I'm no material scientist, but I'm pretty sure of that. And the articles on the cruisers all give the size as 32cm, just like the initially quoted gun. And there is a perfectly clear photo of the crew standing on the deck of one of the cruisers, with the gun directly to starboard, and it certainly looks much more like a 12"-class gun than a 44"-class guns. Although I wouldn't dare use such original research as proof of anything. Perhaps "112cm" is referring to the length of the projectiles, or something? If so, it really needs to me made clear in the text, because traditionally when one says "a (blank)-centimeter shell", the automatic assumption is that it refers to the size of the bore, not length of shell (in fact, I don't think I've ever seen the length of a shell specified anywhere, as it's only pertinent to ballistics. AnnaGoFast 20:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]