Talk:Campsfield House Immigration Removal Centre

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law Enforcement

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

I would argue that the "Opposition to Campsfield House" section is lacking in NPOV. Any suggestions? -- User:Voyelles

This entry is out of date as the management is now MITIE. See http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/aboutus/organisation/immigrationremovalcentres/campsfield Putt1ck (talk) 08:11, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The existing text is hopelessly out of date and utterly lacks NPOV, amounting to a platform for those who oppose immigration control, or at least, NIMBY. Their views should be reported of course but they represent a tiny proportion of the general population, as the 2010 Witney Election result so clearly shows. I have updated with the most recent full inspection report which gives a most positive assessment of the place, also the outcome of investigation of the arson attack on the establishment.Unraed (talk) 17:00, 30 December 2014 (UTC)unraed[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Campsfield House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100806213217/http://uk.news.yahoo.com:80/18/20100803/tuk-hunger-strike-at-immigration-centre-a7ad41d.html to http://uk.news.yahoo.com/18/20100803/tuk-hunger-strike-at-immigration-centre-a7ad41d.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:53, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Addition

I suggest that information about the possible re-opening of the camp is included, following comments from the government

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5y87yp75ego https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c977qqer84go 161.73.253.41 (talk) 12:58, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]