This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
There's a few other numbered-reserve articles kicking around, and one or two of them (like this one) have 0 population. I'm not sure about this. Are we going to list every numbered IR in BC? Or just those that are inhabited? And re the latter is it the Indian Act name, i.e. the numbered designation they should be listed under, or the local government. I can see the point with uninhabited reserves if there's a history, i.e. there were specific reallocations/de-allocations related to the reserve, or for some other reason its history as to when or why it became a reserve is of interest. Otherwise a full listing/articling of BC Indian Reserves seems implied by the existence of this (I think another is Pavilion 1, British Columbia; NB which is not the same (though almost) as Pavilion, British Columbia (which should have an article that includes non-native residents/ranches/features instead of just Tsxwaylac/St'at'imc refs). In the case of Cameron Bar, it's one of perhaps a hundred reserves in the Canyon, but effectively they can all be boiled down to which of several band governments manages which reserves, uninhabited/inhabited (not necessarily Nlaka'pamux politically as some aren't part of the group council).Skookum118:50, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]