Talk:Buffalo crime family/Archives/2013

Name

Why is this family on wikipedia not named "The Magaddino crime family" (Magaddino led the family for more than 50 years !), instead of the Buffalo crime family? I thought this was the orignal name for the family given by the FBI. --77.250.216.55 (talk) 02:08, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Article origins

The previous article that was placed as "The Buffalo crime family" was copied from my personal page that I previously had on Wikipedia, that article was a first draft of an article which I have since revised with a ton of new and more accurate information. As it stood the article needed a great deal of revision and an additional information that was missing such as the very important Boss succession! I can see the article was practically word for word in regards to my old article, but I don't want anyone thinking I put this article up, as I did not and this is proven by checking the article history! To begin with I am surprised to see an article on the Buffalo crime family when in the past my efforts to write articles regarding the Buffalo crime family have been censored and it was previously decided by the so called "Mafia Expert" on Wikipedia that I did not quote sources or at times it seemed I did not have enough sources. Allegedly the information I use in my articles was not correct even though all of it had been carried in newspapers, online articles and books many times before i used it in past Buffalo organized crime articles on Wikipedia. This Buffalo crime family article seems to prove exactly what I stated in the past, that the moderators on Wikipedia chose who should be censored and who's work is not up to their standards as this article quotes no sources what so ever, is not even remotely complete and needs a multitude or revision!

It's funny, I was writing an article for my web page on "American Organized Crime" and came across that former article while I was searching for information concerning former Buffalo crime family Boss, Joseph Peter DiCarlo and was taken completely by surprise that the article was even allowed by the so called "Mafia Expert", but it goes to show that he likes to pick and chose who he allows to post on Wikipedia because when I put up a basically similar article it was removed! This article is in actuality my work and if I get a chance I will revise it so it meets Wikipedia standards, right now I am writing another article, but i will bet my life that no matter what sources I quote or what information I give, there will be a problem! --—Preceding unsigned comment added by Little Joe Shots (talk • contribs) 20:24, 5 April 2007

• Hey Joe. Just want to give you a suggestion that might help. In-text citations are the prefered manner of sourcing in Wikipedia these days. If you try to use that method in your articles, you might get a little less flack for your sourcing. In-text ciatation and how to use them can be found at Wikipedia:Citing_sources. Using the reference tags is explained at Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Footnotes. Make sure you cite the pages the information comes from in the book. Best of luck! --Lendorien 20:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

• Thank you for your comments or input, I understand and I will work in the future towards exactly what you recommend! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Little Joe Shots (talk • contribs) 00:41, 2 July 2007

Cleanup

Article contains a lot of great information, but it needs to be copy edited, properly sourced and organized in a more coherant fashion. Expert attention is probably needed as well. --Lendorien 19:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

• I'm editing this bit by bit (including some structural work), but it still needs a serious fact check by an expert and references added. --Pandora 18:56, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Horrible

This article is terrible. It is too long, it is plagued with dead links, too much POV, and someone felt the need to end numerous sentences with exclamation points. I suggest deleting over half what is written. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.20.11.116 (talk • contribs) 20:03, 25 April 2007

I wish you would have left your name so I could have placed this message on your page, but I guess you didn't feel the need. First off the article, if that piece of garbage that was on here previously can even be called that was a knock off of one of my forum posts with the sentences and paragraphs completely mixed, done in my opinion purposely as a joke. It had no sources what so ever or followed any of the other so called "Wikipedia Guidelines", but there was not one comment box any where and that article would have been left that way if I had not replaced it. As far as the numerous exclamation points, that was done purposely because it was the Buffalo crime family, I had recently had a small argument with someone on this website about information regarding the Buffalo crime family and citing sources, it was done to exaggerate a point, just as the "Cent Anni" comment I left at the bottom of the article, which i have since erased, I had forgotten about it. The comment and the exclamation points were a private joke of sorts that somebody, but I agree I shouldn't be so childish and use the articles to express my personal feelings or frustration, that should be done on the discussion pages. You won't find anything like that in any of the other articles I wrote, it was strictly something concerning the Buffalo crime family and Joe Todaro Sr. or more accurately it concerned my writing about those two subjects which is continuously slammed for not citing sources, but even when i do there is always some bullshit comment to be made.

As for being to long, that's ridiculous, I've seen articles written about individual people, biographies and many other subjects that are twice as long as the Buffalo crime family article! You state the article is plagued with "dead links", point them out. If your so knowledgeable about the Buffalo crime family or organized crime then you should re-write the article. Let me say one more time that I have come across dozens and dozens of organized crime based articles on Wikipedia that are complete garbage, they are either full of incorrect information or made up information and some of them don't even make sense and are written terribly. Those articles in question are never bothered with, none of the moderators, administrators or contributors bother with those articles so they end up being considered credible or fact based and the reader gets totally false or out right made up information, that's a disgrace!

I'm not an expert writer and I have never claimed to be, if I ever intend to get the organized crime book I'm working on published I will certainly have to learn a thing or two about writing professionally, but let me tell you what professionalism is worth when the information is completely incorrect, not credible or out right false, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! Obviously my strength right now is my knowledge concerning organized crime history and current events, not my writing ability, which is something I will continue to work, so instead of being so critical people who feel the grammar, writing style or format of an article needs to be worked on or changed then they should do the readers a favor and just correct what needs to be corrected, isn't that the whole idea behind being able to edit these articles?

Once again I apologize for the exclamation points and the comment at the end of the article, I have already apologized to MadMax for a previous comment as it was basically about the same subject or situation. (he knows what I'm talking about) —Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:Little Joe Shots

|Little Joe Shots ]] ([[User talk:Little Joe Shots |talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Little Joe Shots |contribs]]) 00:39, 2 July 2007

Suggestions for Cleanup

I do not believe that there is anything wrong with the length of the article. Perhaps the last two sections about 'the Future of the Arm' and 'the next boss' could be merged. Also, the tone of these two final sections being mostly in the present tense suggests a newspaper article. Just a thought. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bordeaux1 (talk • contribs) 10:54, 2 July 2007

I see the bickering regarding the sources and criticisms of the content. However for now I think the biggest issuse is gammer, exclaimation marks, and sentance flow. Too many sentances end like this! It gets really old quick! Everything I type is super exciting! Seriously though, clean the exclamations. Proof read this thing. Fix the sentances which make no sense. Get rid of the duplicated material. I'm a wikipedia newb, so I don't really think I should even try to touch this.

There is a lot of great information in this article, however before this can even be re-written, it needs to be converted to English first. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.216.70.60 (talk • contribs) 19:14, 10 July 2007

Excellent

I beilive this Is and excellent article about the Buffalo Crime Family, Being that i am from Buffalo And had no idea of this Family being in my Home town, Also being that when i brought up this Topic i learnd that Three of my Uncles happen to work for the Family, But two have died and on is in Prison, but knowing of this has brought a big smile to my face.I give this article to thumbs up.

LJS, Corrections for the Page!

2:55pm EST, 24 March 2008 From: Frank from the Falls

LJS, This is Frank from the Falls. You should know how to get in touch with me if you have questions – we’ve written each other before.

You asked me several months ago to take a look at this. Sorry it took so long. The article is good, and is one of the few comprehensive attempts at Buffalo mob history I’ve found online (next to AmericanMafia.com) so it’s good you’ve offered more info/different angles.

Below are some corrections, tidbits, and advice. Things you completely didn’t talk much about (like DiCarlo Jr or certain things, I didn’t really add much new stuff…more over, this is an attempt to fix some minor factual errors.) so please don’t take it personal or think I’m ripping this apart by adding a few suggestions or changes – I think it’s very good. With the exception of playing a little too heavy on competing “factions,” I think is a good piece. (I’ll explain below, but I don’t believe the family broke into ‘warring’ factions until the early 80s…but I’ll explain that).

I’ll take this section by section, commenting in the order that you have referenced things…

In the very first part, Magaddino’s nickname in the streets and the media by the end was “The Old Man.”

According to Palmieri’s obituary and two other news articles from the Courier and Evening News, he came to Buffalo in 1911 then opened a saloon at 99 Dante’s Place/Canal Street. (He’d been a Brooklyn dock worker several years before moving to Buffalo). I’d be careful saying he led a band of Black Hand extortionists, he led a band of mobsters for sure, but I’ve never been able to link the early Buffalo Black Hand extortionists to the powerful Mafia cliques that emerged during Prohibition. Augello might be my best attempt, but even still, it’s a link to say Palmieri led Black Handers. He was a powerful guy, and there were Black Handers, but I haven’t been able to link the two. Let me know if you have some sources on that though. PS, Palmieri’s real nickname/moniker seems to be “Don Nitto.”

You go good saying he has mistakenly been labeled the first Mafia boss! You’re right on the money there. It’s been a popular Internet rumor it seems, but it’s wrong to say Palmeri was the first boss. Joe Griffin did this…I read a “Super Crack” article online too, but in reality, DiCarlo was in town years before Palmieri was. (Don’t believe everything you read online). As for the earliest guys, Giovanni and Angelo Puma (they were both Castellammarese), they were listed as early gang leaders in the Italian quarters – well, that’s not true, Angelo Puma was listed as a leader, and he allegedly came to Buffalo to meet Giovanni – I have nothing on Giovanni though, a lot more on Angelo Puma. There were several Black Hand leaders (which I think I’d sent to you before). And Joe Carlino was an early padrone, saloon boss, labor union boss, elected Democrat politician (he was Benedetto Madonia’s superior – the Barrel Murder victim from 1901ish). These were the earliest – before both Palmeri and DiCarlo – but none were actual “Mafia Bosses” as we call them today, more gangland chieftains.

Giuseppe “Joe” DiCarlo Sr. came to Buffalo around 1908 (some have listed 1909). You have 1911 listed, claiming he arrived after Palmeri. He came to Buffalo a few years before Palmeri, so don’t necessarily believe everything Griffen wrote…he was FBI a half century later, and the FBI didn’t follow Palmieri or the older DiCarlo back then. Either way, it’s safe to say DiCarlo was in Buffalo years before Palmeri and was the real power. You write: Palmeri had a “reputation as an established businessman, respected by his community.” Palmeri was feared and hated – a known criminal and killer and ruthless extortionist (by all accounts). Several claim DiCarlo (and more his wife) were contributors to charity and loved by the Italians. Palmeri wasn’t the old don you see from the movies where children and women run up and kiss his pinky – he was the evil looking guy in the back of the bar the women and children were told to stay away from. (OK, these aren’t facts I’m giving you here, just personal observations from research. I’ve never read many good words about Palmeri. His obit may be his best, in that it said he was honored by many at his funeral, but he wasn’t a good guy by any means).

I would be careful saying DiCarlo and Palmeri “merged their groups to form one strong mafia crime family.” Back then, it wasn’t aunified Mafia Family, and they both had power, not necessarily two different clans though – the mobsters worked under both of them.

Moving on to Mags, you write “In 1921 he was arrested in New York, along with a close associate and fellow Castellammarese named Gaspar Milazzo, for their alleged involvement in a murder of man in Avon, New Jersey.” Milazzo wasn’t arrested for his role in the Good Killers, he was never publicly linked to Magaddino until he after he was murdered. Milazzo was a Castellammarese chief in Brooklyn, left when Magaddino did, but make sure to take out the part where he was arrested for the New Jersey Caiazzo murder – he was not linked at all…that was Magaddino, Puma, Bonventre and some 10 other people. The best modern account I’ve ever read on that (which seems to examine numerous OLDER sources is Tom Hunt, Mike Tona article – both of whom are more researched and better writers than myself – it’s well sourced too, so I’d take everything they say in there as pretty accurate… http://www.onewal.com/a014/f_goodkillers.html

Also, you write Mags moved to Lewiston in 1922. He actually moved to Niagara Falls and lived on Whitney Street (where his brother Nino, brother-in-law Nick Longo, captain Simon Barruso, and Sam Rangatore each had a home on the street – Palmeri lived only blocks away). They didn’t move to Lewiston’s Mafia Row/Dana Drive until much later.

Magaddino’s transition to leadership: you write “upon the death of Joseph Peter DiCarlo, Palmeri urged the respected and feared Magaddino to succeed DiCarlo.” That seems to be the common misconception, but Magaddino was operating in Buffalo and the Falls prior to DiCarlo’s death. He had been said to be peddling “home juice.” It’s the Mafia myth, un-cite-able, but they say he used to go house to house forcing residents to buy his bottles of juice which did nothing – plain extortion. For accurate records, immigration/residential records will put Magaddino in Buffalo/Falls in 1921, before both the Good Killers triels and the death of DiCarlo. I believe Magaddino operated in both Brooklyn and Buffalo for a time. And yes, being close with Pelmeri helped out – but he had been Palmeri’s superior in Brooklyn as well years before…there was no question about that.

Prohibition: you write “Throughout Prohibition the Buffalo crime family had strong ties to Canadian mafia groups in southern Ontario” … he had several beefs with Canadian Calabrians. At first, he was in direct competition with Perri and their guys were battling for control of the Niagara Penninsula – both sides of the broder. Then they formed an alliance where Perri would take shipments (sometimes from Mags contacts in Canada) then get it to the Falls, where BFLO/Magaddino men would move the rest. But that didn’t last too long and they began fighting again. Several Prohibition murder in WNY/Southern Ontario were beefs between these two men.

The “Sugar Wars” you speak of – that wasn’t really Magaddino’s Family vs. Porello’s. Afetr much of the Porello’s were killed off in Cleveland, one came to Buffalo, followed 6 months or so later by his nephew. They allegedly tried to muscle in on some corn sugar. One Porello was shot outside of a Varisco-owned bar, allegedly controlled by the Callea bro’s under Magaddino. Official reports sad Varisco (an elected politician and convicted felon) claimed it was a shooting over a game of pool where the loosers didn’t pay. The Callea’s were murdered a little while later, and police believed the Porello’s responsible, but it was a wild conspiracy and hard to link. So, in reality, it wasn’t “Sugar Wars” between Magaddino’s and Porello’s Mafia families…The Porello’s went down in Cleveland, some remnants moved to Buffalo, but couldn’t get their foot in the door. When talking about the Prohibition murders in WNY, some linked to bootleg feuds, some linked to Sugar wars – as I said, there really weren’t Sugar Wars, but many were also linked to gambling-related feuds – which was a big racket even back then. STILL MORE, personal/vendetta/family feuds caused a lot of murders – not necessarily linked to O.C. - - - but the papers always linked gangster-vendetta feuds to what they called the Mafia back then – often not the case though…

As for the Castellammarese War – have you ever found any sources for Mags sending $5,000 a week to Brooklyn for the fight. It’s written in Joe Bonanno’s book, but I’ve never seen it other than that (maybe the cheesy Mafia Encyclopedia)…just curious though????? I also like how you write “some believe” about Detroit’s Milano getting a spot on the Commission, I’ve heard it before several times, but the more accurate sources make it sound like only 5 from NYC, 1 from Buffalo, and 1 from Chicago made up the Commission.

I would be careful saying in ’33 that the official underboss was Montana and the consiglieri was Palmeri. That is unknown. We know both Magaddino’s brother Nino and Montana were considered leaders, but the titles were never given to them. Palmeri can only really be listed as consiglieri because of his prior prominence in buffalo. Several times below I will try and steer you away from use of these titles, because sources have often placed Montana as underboss, captain, consiglieri…and several other people too. These titles were thrown around too easily and are unverified. Using words like official underboss makes little sense to me – I know that’s the popular Hollywood-style Mafia Family structure, but A) Magaddino didn’t seem big on those titles/traditional structure, and B) there’s no way to truthfully cite those titles – and if you do – it can be negated by an equally credible (or uncredible) source.

Also, you write about John Montana Sr. There is no need for Sr…there was no John Jr. He didn’t have a son I don’t believe. He had a daughter that married into Magaddino’s Family, but his brother’s son (John’s nephew Charles) is the one who married Magaddino’s daughter. Also, Olean isn’t a Buffalo suburb at all. It is a smaller town (Utica-sized) about an hour outside of Buffalo. Montana was on the west Side and I’ve found little record of him in Olean until the 30s). This one here is all hearsay ”he decided to step down as the Underboss in 1958 and was officially demoted to the position of crime family soldier.” His rank was most likely consiglieri if you HAVE TO / MUST give a rank…but it’s common police records that Randaccio was UB at this time. Whether Montana was demoted or asked to step down is unknown. Different second and third hand sources claim it, and one FBI mic in Mags’ Funeral Home heard them discussing that Montana didn’t want to be seen publicly with his guys, but whether he asked to step down or demoted (to official position of soldier) is unknown…maybe throw in some alleged’s or supposedly, or according to some as you wrote a few times…

Canada: After Magaddino worked with Tony Papalia to take out Perri’s remaining ranks after imprisonment during WWII, the leaders of Calabrian OC in Ontario (former Perri) were Bordonaro, and Sylvestro bro’s … with Tony Papalia as a powerful link to the Old Man. Mags sent Santo Scibetta to act as his representative up there, and Schibetta got the old Perri guys under Buffalo – Magaddino formally took the Province of Ontario, approved by the Commission, by the mid 50s – that’s when Freddie Randaccio proposed Papalia for membership (Johnny Pops didn’t become a capo until the 70s/80s apparently). Luppino was a Zip, transplanted from the old country with a name and a crew. He worked under Magaddino, but he didn’t come until the mid 50s. He was something different…not a capo under Magaddino, he was boss in his old home, but he ran a crew and their allegiances were with Magaddino, and he had many ties with Rizzutto’s Sicilian Bonanno’s in Montreal and the other mobsters in Toronto.

Commission: I know Bonanno did it, but I hate the use of ‘conservative’ mafia vs. ‘liberal.’ That’s not how it was, and while it made for a good story, there was no definite faction. The guys voted differently on every issue, not always as a pact-alliance group. Magaddino eventually had open hatred of Bonanno. He had a major beef with Genovese. When Lucchese and Gambino were consolidating power within the Commission, they wooed Stefano and made him the figure-head head of he Commission, like Speaker of the House or soemthing. Magaddino didn’t “defect” as you write to the liberal faction, he got more from Gambino and Lucchese than he was from his own little cousin, who he had major beefs with. Profaci’s camp was marred with dissention by then, but Magaddino didn’t switch loyalty…he got new friends when new friends came – he was always known as the man who was good at self-preservation…he would go with whoever would help him the most. The Commission wasn’t a Conservative vs. Liberal by any means, it was one man trying to get power over another…and Magaddino played politics. I know this is a two-party political system we live in here in America, but the Commission was not exactly like that. Magaddino hated Genovese – Gambino eventually did too. (He used Genovese to be names boss after Mangano, but quickly made it known he was not Genovese’s puppet by any means). Naturally Gambino and Magaddino would become friends as they had the same rivals… The fact that Magaddino represented the Old style and Gambino was an American-type gangster made little difference – they were all power-hungry…

As for Magaddino’s semi-retirement by the ‘60s, I think he was getting old, but semi-retirement is a stretch. He never liked tog et his hands dirty when he was younger, so he let Freddie Randaccio do his thing (and Freddie was a great earner and organizer), but Magaddino’s health gave way – I doubt he was really preparing for semi-retirement.

You write “it is believed he took over after the death of former Underboss, Angelo Aquisto in 1956.” Where is it believed? I don’t think this was true at all… Some sources would indicate that Randaccio became UB after Pieri in the mid ‘50s, but that didn’t come out until the Senate hearings in ‘63ish – and it’s just plain wrong. Acquisto was a power, and huge in gambling, and some of his men ran the biggest gambling halls and craps games in town…he certainly was a power in Buffalo, but to say he was the “official underboss” is inaccurate – unless you have some report I’ve never seen!! (If you do, let me know!!!) Acquisto was powerful, but not the UB. One FBI guy told me he was actually a popular guy who worked under capo Nicky Panaro (aka Snow Snow), but I’ve never been able to substantiate that. In all honesty though, I think Acquisto was a giant earner, I don’t think he was the Old Man’s eyes and ears in Buffalo though. I’d be interested to hear of any sources you have about Acquisto or arrest details…

Be careful when calling Randaccio the “acting boss” by law enforcement, that may be true depending on how you define it. Several crews in Buffalo and Ontario reported to him, but Niagara Falls still reported to Magaddino and his sons, Falcone’s in Utica and the whole Rochester situation – they may not have been ‘under’ Randaccio. And Carlisi (while he didn’t really have a crew) was the labor guru (and gambling too) because of Chicago connections and did his own thing – everybody respected him. Todaro didn’t control bookmaking for the arm back then. Billiteri was a giat bookmaker/loan shark – he worked under Commilleri. There were several others too. Todaro was a capo, but not a controller back then. I know Griffin loves it because he raided it, but Spano’s blue Banner club was one of many places where the Family would play cards and meet. There were places on Conencticut, Niagara Street, Grant, Oliver Street in N Ton and places in the falls (Allegedly a huge one downtown on Chicago Street). They met all over, the Blue Banner wasn’t the headquarters of the Mafia in Buffalo…or ‘prinicple base of operations’ as is written there on wiki.

As for a bit of logistical writing adive, I’d start a new paragraph when talking about the Little Apalachin raid. That way when you talk about Todaro’s law suit afterwards, it could be the same paragraph. Then a new paragraph when talking about the Randaccio, Natarelli, Caci trial…just a thought though about paragraph breaks…

You might want to throw in the Paddy Calabrese was the first person relocated by the Federal Gove – the first person of WitSec ever. Some sources have claimed that he was the first ‘made’ member to testify, but I can’t verify if he was made – I suspect he may just have been an associate – but the more romantic version is that he was made then flipped. In any event, he was the first guy to testify about the mob bosses in Buffalo – perhaps did the most damage of any rats in Buffalo (possibly Ron fino is up there, but that’s all opinion).

You say Pete Magaddino took over as Acting Underboss after Randaccio’s conviction…you can drop the ‘acting.’ All sources name him UB, there’s no need for Acting unless someone sitting in temporarily, or the real power is in jail or something. Titles aren’t as important as Hollywood has made them…

Also, you write about Randaccio being in jail with Michael Verdetto Jr. – you should explain why that is important and who he really was…

There are some minor grammatical typos when talking about the Bana War (misspellings)…that’s all.

I read griffin and several places on line, do you have any additional sources about Magaddino not giving the yearly bonus to capos or what it had been in the past – just curious…that’s been hard for me to substantiate.  ????? You write this: “After learning about the amount of cash the Magaddino's had possessed it was reported that the top crime family members wanted to kill Boss, Stefano Magaddino, but feared the retribution they would receive from the Commission for an unsanctioned hit of a mafia Boss! In place of the hit the Buffalo crime family's top members no longer loyal to Magaddino opted to revolt and replace Magaddino as Boss!” THAT IS WAY TOO DRAMATIC. I’ve never read that anyone wanted to hit Magaddino. I don’t believe anyone wanted to hit Magaddino because of the retribution…And I’ve never heard any records of the commission debating / voting no on a hit against Magaddino. Instead of killing him, they revolted…That’s too much there… People were pissed, but it wasn’t a beef where bullets were going to fly at Magaddino…unless you have some hidden source I’ve never heard – it is just kind of fabricated/embellished.

Meetings to replace Magaddino: You write that Pieri, Fino, Todaro, DiCarlo, the Farmer all went to meet with Valenti of Rochester. Where did you find that roster???? 25 Years after Valachi talks about it, but doesn’t list any attendees…just curious as to where that came from – could be logical as they were the leaders of OC in Buffalo, but I’ve never seen an attendee list.

Now, again let me say I like what you write and I am just offering observations and criticism. I am giving this disclaimer because I don’t want you to get the wrong idea about my next comment. The part about the Family splitting into separate factions is completely false. There was no “Magaddino-Loayal Faction” versus the “Dissident Factions” that are broken into sub-factions. That’s too complex and creates the false sense that these guys were pitted against each other…that’s not the case. There were different crews with different leaders, they had different loyalties and often went at each other politicial (in the mob), but there was no beef between Pieri and Fino. I don’t know where that came from, but when Magaddino and his sons were caught with the cash, they were weekended. His sons’ power dwindles and the Family was in unison to pick new leaders. Joe Fino was voted as “Acting Boss.” He was the family’s new leader, but the Commission allegedly gave him a temporary position to see if he could hold it down for the long term. He accepted, and they cut Buffalo’s vote out of the Commission after Magaddino. Joe Fino ruined a lot, he was only boss for a short time, but he let Rochester run away from Buffalo, he let the Commission use him and erase Magaddino’s empire, and he let the crews run themselves – and as a result, skimming occurred and loyalty dwindled.

The FBI names a boss succession after Magaddino – which coinicides with whoever they were investyigating. Bringing down a mobster is one thing, arresting the so-called mob boss gives a lot more credit to the investigation. As such, they were naming guys bosses who really weren’t. According to them, Sal Pieri was named boss in ’69 and they got him on the jewels charge and then (more so) jury tampering. That’s a nice arrest for the FBI, taking out the boss. Then they arrested Joe Fino (and more so his brother and their crew)…they said he was the boss afterwards. Following that, they knew he was friends with Danny Sansanese – they arrested him – they called him boss. All of this was BS to boost the FBIs credibility. Joe Fino was the boss, then the Farmer. Sal Pieri was a gambling guru, but his older brother Joe was always the power.

As for the factions…Magaddino and his bro and sons-in-law were weekend after the raids. You could call them the Magaddino-loyalists faction, but that’s a little false. They were with the boss and his power was erased. Then you go on about the Pieri-Frangiamore faction vs. the Fino-Sansanese faction. Those were four different crews respectively, not two factions aligned against each other to usurp the bosses for control of the Family. That’s too dramatic. Johnny Rai was in prison at the time, never a capo. Joe Pieri was the Pieri power. He took over the old DiCarlo crews and DC Jr was now more of an advisor than anything – he was old and getting sick. Tony Romano was a liaison to other places like Florida, NYC, Vegas, and California…very similar to Johnny Catz 20 years later. They would go to different places and represent Buffalo on some cross-country schemes. I have numerous article and police reports listing him as a capo, but he had no crew and had never been a capo before – I personally believe they only called him that because they arrested him with Sammy Pieri and Vic Randaccio…and arresting the “boss” and his “capo” is a big arrest – I don’t believe either one was a correct title… You say the Fino-Sansanese faction was made up of Joe ino, Danny Sansanese, Joe Todaro, and Cammilleri, and Natarelli. Natarelli was in prison (w/ Randacico). When he got out, they gave him Niagara Falls because of some loose things up there after Magaddino’s demise, and he was somewhat close with JT in his later days. All-in-all, these weren’t factions, just different crews. Yes, Fino was closest with Sansanese by the end, he had been close with Cammilleri. But it wasn’t Pieri’s guys vs. Fino’s guys. When the Old Man was voted out, all the crews supported Fino…Pieri’s too. Fino wasn’t the best organizer with the most respect, so others eventually tried to get control…but at this time, all the crews were together in following the new bosses…it’s unfair to say the Pieri faction vs. the Fino faction. PLUS, the Farmer was Todaro’s uncle, they wouldn’t have been on different factions… and one time you write the Pieri-Farmer faction, another time you write the Todaro-Farmer faction…???...so who was Frangiamore with more then, since you’ve pitted the two “factions” up against each other. There were different crews with different allies, but all in all, everyone wanted Magaddino gone and weren’t fighting each other to replace him. It was Joe Fino’s time as boss, but he sucked and the Commission eventually told him no, then it was Sam Farmer’s job as boss…then it was Todaro. The other ‘acting’ bosses or factions were fabricated, assumed, or alluded too by sources that didn’t know…Joe Griffin came out and said this AFTER he wrote his book…also apologized because he names Sal Pieri the boss and in retrospect, he said, that wasn’t true. If you want to go into “factions,” you could say there were two in Rochester. Valenti pulled his guys away from Buffalo, he got arrested. Russotti took over. Russotti continued some independence but knew Buffalo had resources so continued some relations with Buffalo. Over time, the Rochester factions killed themselves and Buffalo took back over. Besides Rochester though, Buffalo didn’t have any FACTIONS and sub groups. Magaddino was kicked out, he was replaced, his boss sucked, he was replaced. The Fino vs. Pieri businesses is made up…I could give you a dozen sources that put Fino and Pieri on good terms running clubs and operations together.

Griffin learned through informers Pieri was boss; he later/post publishing his book, came out and said he had it wrong as did his informers. Pieri was a power, which is why they thought he was boss, but not THE power. Also, do you have a source for the April ’69 meeting in Manhattan with the Genovese…I’d like to read more about that!!! After Magaddino went down, the Genovese (his enemy) took voting rights from the family…Many in the Magaddino Family had more ties to the Gambino’s that the Genovese… What source do you have that DiCarlo was consiglieri… He was old and an advisor to the Pieri’s, but does that make him consiglieri?? I’ve also read Joe Falcone from Utica was the consiglieri…any sources on either of those??? Or Vinny Scro as consiglieri??? I tend to believe that the official position names/titles for Consiglieri in Buffalo weren’t even used…let me know though!

As for the boss transition, you can’t really say Joe Pieri was official acting UB, or Sansanese, or anything like that. That period is unknown to be official, and those titles weren’t ever used – let alone credible. According to the police, there was a top boss (Fino, then Farmer) and a contingent of underbosses, almost a council, including Pieri, Fino, Charlie Cassero-took over Cammilleri’s crew), etc etc etc The titles acting underboss and even consiglieri were made up somewhere – I’m not saying you – but they can’t be substantiated and look a little wrong, so I’d be careful there and perhaps get rid of the titles.

In ’73 is when the Family split. New factions formed. Fino was being replaced by the Farmer, who had been a power in Local 210. After Carlisi’s days were over, Local 210 turned into the Wild West. Vic Randaccio (longtime BM) was apparently getting greedy with family appointments…not Mob family, personal family. Fino had a lot of support (Pieri, Fino, Cammilelri), while Randaccio was liked by the farmer, JT, etc). I’m not sure where Sansanese fit in here. Wither way, the Family was pissed at Randaccio for not following order. Ronnie Fino was elected BM. He pissed off some people, and Cammilleri complained to the leadership. Joe Fino always had his sons’ back. The Family leadership then wanted to shit Joe Fino and Cammilleri up for asking for too much, and instructed Ronnie Fino to follow mob orders and put several of the Farmers/Randaccio’s guys back in the union. There was a complex web of double-dealings…but in the end, the Family decided to hit Cammilleri for complaining. His crew was taken over by Cassero and some people later went under Joey Pizza Sr. That was the only time factions really came into play, and the Famrer ended it quickly. As for his underboss, the FBI believed it was a three-man council. And they kept saying Sammy Pieri was a boss. He was in and out of jail throughout the 70s. Every time they got out, they watched closely and arrested him again…his brother Joe Pieri was his capo and was the real power…

You’re right about the LoTempio’s. The Frank that passed away in the ‘70s (related to the Pieri’s) was married in ’36. At his wedding, there was a Magaddino-related murder. His brother-in-l;aw nick Longo was moving in on Batavia bookmaking rings, run by a different yet distantly related Frank LoTempio and Al Panapinto. They bombed his home in ’36 and Mags’ sister died. Afetrwards, the entire Batavia crew was taken out with several hits and bombings… This statement is wrong: “The killing of Cammmilleri was seen as a part of the Pieri-Frangiamore factions final bid to take over the Buffalo crime family” Cammilleri was second cousins with Pieri. Farmer was already in power. Ronnie Fino had to go to him for permission…Cammilleri was taken out for claiming he’d pull his crew independent of the Family if he wasn’t given a UNION spot. His murder wasn’t quite for control of Local 210, but it was to shut him up from disobeying orders from mob leadership.

What source do you have by saying in ’74 the Famrer was approved by the Commission to be the “new official acting boss.” He was boss…the rest is just FBI-built dramatic words…there was no acting at this point…

To say the farmer stepped down for Pieri, or was front boss – that’s ridiculous. I don’t believe DiCarlo was consiglieri either…he was an old man, a former gangster, not a Mafia statesman. Armer was never front boss for anyone and didn’t step down for Pieri. He reorganized thigns after Joe Fino lost control of the Family, and he was perhaps the only person in the Family’s history (barring present day) where a boss succession was done according to plan…he handed the reigns over to his nephew Joe Todaro around 80/81.

You write: “what can be definitely determined is that Sam Frangiamore and Sam Pieri were the two top Bosses in the Buffalo crime family from 1974-78, some say Pieri was Boss and Frangiamore Underboss, while others are sure Frangiamore was the official Boss and Pieri was the Underboss” This is wrong and can’t be definitely said. According to the FBI (at the time) there was a council of underbosses underneath the Farmer…and Pieri was in and out of jail. (As I said earlier, he was the publicity hound, his brother Joe was the real power).

Do you have any sources to say when Pieri got locked up in ’78, the underboss became Joe Pieri and the consiglieri was Vincent Scro????? I’ve never seen some, so I’m fishing for leads here…not calling you out. I figure you got the info from somewhere, I’d like to check it out!!!!

You go on to say the Frangiamore-todaro faction led the Family… BUT, you had put the Farmer with Pieri for, and made it seem like the Todaro’s were at odds with the Pieri’s. I think the sue of factions has confused things (and possibly yourself) as loyalties switch often between crews…

The ’84 meeting in NYC with former DiCarlo crew gambling chieftain Tronlone was regarding Local 210, not the leadership of the Family. Pieri’s kids didn’t like Todaro’s kid…that’s where the beefs came. Todaro was close with Ronnie Fino, so they devised a scheme to break Erie County (Local 210 territory) into different geographic areas for the different crews (the Pieri’s got the raw end of the deal with parts of the city and some northern suburbs). They complained to the Genovese, who represented them, but Todaro was related to a few Gambino’s and had much more pull. In the end, Joe Pieri had to retire in his old age and told his sons to be loyal to the Todaro’s, even though they didn’t get along at all. Besides Cammilleri’s murder, this is the only time in the Family’s history where factions could be used, and both were more regarding LIUNA Local 210 than the entire Family. (Besides the 1950s when one capo went independent and started a faction/pulled away from Magaddino – they were quickly killed though…capo’s name was Joe Occhino…I have no sources other than two conversations though, one in person, one online. The first time I gave little credit, but the story was retold by someone completely different so I tend to believe Occhino pulled his crew away from Magaddino and was murdered because of it). Besides Cammilleri and the sons of Pieri-Todaro though (both regarding Local 210) there were factions in Buffalo…well, there was the A, B, and C, teams in Rochester - - - but that’s an entirely different story!!!

I’d be careful calling the younger Todaro acting boss of the Family…he will sue everybody if he read this. I would say, “according to the FBI” and be careful what you say – because in all honesty, you could write anything about any alleged mob boss in the country – but the Todaro’s have tried hard to either be legit, or look like it, and they’ve sued a lot of people for defamation of character. Be careful, he’s still the official underboss according to the FBI, and while his father is pushing 90, be careful calling him ‘acting boss.’ Titles can add problems… And if you mention Joey III and his wife Carla, they might sue you just for associating them with this article…just be careful man!!!

As for Vegas, what’s that about Nicoletti Sr. going there??? Sounds doable, but I know little of his later years. Magaddino had been sending guys to Vegas since the 40s. The Blistzein hit was not LCN…just some wannabes. And again, Cino and Panaro were acquitted of having anything to do with that murder – they weren’t involved – they were just locking up loansharks in Vegas and making them pay the Buffalo/LA guys in town…not the murder at all though.

Personally, I would just get rid of the final section…Future boss. You can’t say Lenny Falzone is the UB and Joey Pizza Jr is boss…that’s never been made public and they will sue… It’s kind of doubtful too, knowing the age of them. It’s also doubtful Sonny Nicoletti is underboss. He just got out of a short sentence for running a 1-800 telephone betting service.

So, all in all, I think you’ve got a real good article. And while it might seem like a lot of corrections I added, the overall theme is good. Besides the overuse of dramatic “factions” and leadership “titiles,” I think you’re on the money.

As for boss succession, I would put it like this: Giuseppe DiCarlo Sr. Stefano Magaddino (Joe Fino, acting) Sam Frangiamore Joe Todaro Sr.

Anything else has been embellished!!!!!!!

All in all it looks good!!!!! One of the better pieces on the mob from Buffalo on the Internet. Again, if you need specific sources, let me know…I’ll see what I can drum up. And as always, I think you know how to contact me. Feel free to PMK me over on the RealDeal site… or, Frank.Ticci@buffalo.com Sorry it took so long to do the critiquing you asked for, but all in all, barring some minor changes, it looks good!

You grossly minimize the extent of the faction rivalries. As someone who was at ground zero and in the trenches in both the A, B, C wars and the lesser know spill over into Utica, I can tell you that factional hostility was as deep as any in the history of the LCN, and there is a body count to prove it.

Far too much hair splitting

Give or take some semantics, some very minor POV issues, and some potential contradicting information to which there may be no documented conclusion, (Randaccio being an acting boss for example. There is little documentation that he was, although it is almost certainly true) this article is excellent, and the accuracy of the information contained is well above par The tags at the header of the artical should be removed —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.160.5.25 (talk) 21:52, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

LIUNA Locals

When discussing the LIUNA locals, Utica is mentioned. It was in fact, a smaller local in the neighboring city of Rome NY that was better connected. This was the now defunked Local 442. This crew was far under the radar, but included at least two made guys and several associates —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.147.53.67 (talk) 03:36, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Some missing info

“Tony Pro” complicating things in in Dutchess county, Pittston and the Columbo families making moves on upstate NY in the 80s, including a body count. (Marrone, Both Grillos, Faliciano, Dequino ) Pittsburgh advocating for Velenti, The bungled tri willow caper, the rise and fall of the Falange crew, etc Is there a reason you don’t think these things belong ? If not, please let me know, or I will take the liberty of adding them myself —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.147.53.67 (talk) 03:54, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

All that is legit,(with the exception of tri willow, which was at best colateral damage) but where would it end ? You could write a book on what went on in the mid 70s-late 80s in upstate NY. Becuse of the LIUNA locals, "the arm" had more associates and mini battles than any crime organization in history. The Columbos were chasing nickles in Utica becuse they couldn't find a place to lay their heads in NYC, and Pittsburgh was knocked out of the box in Rochester by the Buffalo loyalists. Some people got killed, but it was all small potatoes. The Falange crew got too brazen too quick,and put themselves in the feds crosshairs. They turned a dispute with a few Pittston associates into war, and it could have been settled with a sit down. Forget that stuff about the commission and that "Cow Town" comment I have seen all over the internet. That was a misquote of what Tony Ducks had said years earlier, and had nothing to do with what was going on in 80-83. 71.147.56.219 (talk) 23:54, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

"No one cares who runs those cow towns" is exactly what Tony Ducks said and he said it when D'Elia from Scranton went to him for a ruling on the dispute with Buffalo and the Colombo associated locals. The Luccheses were smart enough, and the only NY family, to steer completely clear of that stupidity. 7 LCN families fighting over nickles and dimes shaken down from strip club owners, 2nd rate bookies and half ass shylocks. The LIUNA locals were so broke by that point they couldn't wash a dime. It was complete insanity and guys thinking it was Utica 1950 instead of 1980. As for the Falange crew being too brazen, be careful who you lump in with them. It was in fact outsiders, wannabes and local cowboys who made things hot and brought them down with them. The things first mentioned in the missing info post are all legit but to me at least, side issues when you discuss the Buffalo family Cosand (talk) 16:54, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Needs Many Puncuation Corrections

Commas are heavily used to create ambiguity, to the point that it's impossible to understand if asides and titles are referring to the preceding or following text. I'd make the corrections myself but the true meaning can't be discerned from the existing text. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.190.119 (talk) 18:02, 12 March 2013 (UTC)