Jump to content

Talk:Brummer-class cruiser/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 17:26, 7 October 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Shouldn't Ol-Marine be Öl-Marine? Couple instances of she vs. they in armament section. Brummer class cruiser should have Brummer-class hyphenated.
    Should all be fixed. Novik doesn't use umlauts so I just followed that. Parsecboy (talk) 10:40, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
    Link boilers, presumably water tube.
    Don't forget this.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:43, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Oops, thanks for catching that. Parsecboy (talk) 13:56, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    No picture or drawing is available?
    File:Brummer class line drawing.jpg should be fine with fair use (and is probably PD anyway - Novik states it's a reproduction of a contemporary illustration. Parsecboy (talk) 10:40, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Brummer-class_cruiser/GA1&oldid=1141709563"