Talk:Broke and Famous

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Reggaeton task force.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Untitled

"Ñejo y Dalmata", exact phrase, have 22,700 ghits. I'm going to look for decent sources. Darkspots (talk) 04:11, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully you did better then the article creator, his got SD'd earlier today. Best of luck, -Carados (talk) 04:12, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saw that! Well, I'll roll the boulder uphill for a little while, see where it gets me. Lotta blogs, as far as I can see. Darkspots (talk) 04:20, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd start by checking to see if any of the ~~ablums their many releases are released on are notable.~~ singles are notable. Apparently, they have a lot.-Carados (talk) 04:21, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They were apparently released on Universal Music Latino, a division of Universal Music Group. Could qualify as a major label. Darkspots (talk) 04:57, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Broke and Famous.jpg

Image:Broke and Famous.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:36, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that I've dealt with this problem. Darkspots (talk) 23:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]