Talk:Briskeby Stadion

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Norwegian football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Event Venues (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Event Venues, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Event VenuesWikipedia:WikiProject Event VenuesTemplate:WikiProject Event VenuesEvent Venues articles

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Briskeby Stadion has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 30, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Briskeby Arena/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 10:24, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
I would convert NOKs with US$
This has been discussed before, and consensus is that currency conversion is quite problematic. Which currency should it be converted to (why US$ and not for instance £ or €, as football has larger interest in UK and Europe than the US), all the time this article will probably be read more by Norwegians than any other particular nationality. There is also the issue of which exchange rate to use, as it will invariably change over time (for instance the NOK to US$-rate has fluctuated between 9.50 to 5.50 kr/$ over the past decade). Should these rates also be adjusted for inflation, and should the inflation rates be adjusted using the home or foreign currencies, and should these be converted with today's or the historic exchange rate? Finding an approximate exchange rate for whatever currency a reader prefers is very easy on the internet. Thus consensus is to not convert currencies, as the only factual information is the actual amount of money in the actual currency being used. Arsenikk ^(talk) 11:58, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your explanation.--GoP _T ^C _N 20:40, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"the latter planned financed" - what does this mean?

"The proposal was supported with by" - should it be "supported by"?
Both fixed. Arsenikk ^(talk) 11:58, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
very broad
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Pass Excellent and interesting article.--GoP _T ^C _N 20:40, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Briskeby Arena. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:14, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 July 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved as proposed. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 07:09, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Briskeby Arena → Briskeby Stadion – Is no reference to "Arena" in the official sites about this football stadium: https://www.fotball.no/fotballdata/anlegg/hjem/?fiksId=1323 & Is named Briskeby Stadion here https://www.hamkam.no/om-stadion/stadion 181.228.126.131 (talk) 16:05, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Giant Snowman 12:11, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Giant Snowman 12:13, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No counterarguments have been filed. Could we move forward with the name change? 181.228.217.90 (talk) 03:21, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.