Talk:Foreign relations of Brazil

Brazil: Government and laws Top‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Government and Laws of Brazil task force (assessed as Top-importance).

International relations High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed WikiProject - Bilateral relations

There is now a upstart WikiProject to establish a concensus about WP's International bilateral relations articles, including "X-Y (country) relations" articles, at Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Bilateral international relations. Interested parties should add their names at Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations/Bilateral relations task force if they wish to play a part in the discussions or have an Interest in this going forward. Thank you for your attention. CaribDigita (talk) 23:02, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed redirect

I proposing redirect:

Into this article, keeping the article history completly intact, allowing editors to remove the redirect and build the article later, comments? Ikip (talk) 05:41, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Diplomatic relations

Brazil just established diplomatic relations with Bhutan Ref. Limongi (talk) 00:18, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Besides that, there is an incongruency between the map and the text. The map shows that there is no relation between Brazil and Iceland, while the text states that Brazil has relations with every member state of the UN, which includes Iceland. Wisapi (talk) 23:28, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Australia

Australia has a consulate in Rio de Janeiro, located at Av. Presidente Wilson, 231 / 23th floor, Centro. The consulate shares the floor with Veirano Advogados, a major lawyering office in the city. Jgsodre ((talk)) —Preceding undated comment added 16:31, 2 January 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Iran

Why is there nothing about iran? iran and brazil have a really high trade values and political values i think some one had deleted the iran section —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.150.136.234 (talk) 18:23, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

da Silva no more

With da Silva no longer on stage, and possibly before, the section on 'his' foreign policy should be folded into the precediing section. Earthlyreason (talk) 20:30, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cesare Battisti

Shouldn't a mention be made on Cesare Battisti's case? It has pretty much strained the relations between Italy and Brazil. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FaceGarlic (talk • contribs) 22:10, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why does Brazil-Turkey relations redirect here currently?

There are Foreign relations of Turkey, but that also redirects here, from Turkey.

pt:Turquia (Turkey in Portuguese) and tr:Brezilya (Brazil in Türkçe). 99.181.146.108 (talk) 12:29, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Foreign relations of Brazil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:37, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Foreign relations of Brazil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:13, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Foreign relations of Brazil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:02, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]