Talk:A Gamut of Games

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Board and table games Low‑importance

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bowling Solitaire was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 04 January 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into A Gamut of Games on 02:42, 5 January 2009 (UTC). The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history.

Poke (game) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 04 January 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into A Gamut of Games on 02:50, 5 January 2009 (UTC). The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history.

The No Game was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 30 December 2008 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into A Gamut of Games on 17:14, 1 January 2009 (UTC). The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history.

Three templates

NPOV

I don't see any NPOV problem with this article. Perhaps it has been fixed? Jdavidb 15:16, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

References

The article links to the book. Do we need documentation for the claim that it's a standard study text for abstract game design? Sounds somewhat plausible to me, but if it's true I'm sure we could dig it up. Jdavidb 15:16, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic

I disagree. I think it is quite encyclopedic. There are lots of books with articles in Wikipedia. If this book is a significant text in a field, it belongs here. Wiki is not paper; we will not run out of room because of its inclusion. Jdavidb 15:16, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bowling Solitaire

I started the page for bowling Solitaire.--Sonjaaa 10:01, August 24, 2005 (UTC)

PDF Gamut of games

it's still in the market this book?

isn't this just a list? More 02:44, 5 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by SlamMeMore (talk • contribs) [reply]