Talk:Blood Wedding

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Blood Wedding article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Theatre High‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spain

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Themes

The section near the bottom, that talks about the 'themes' of the play, sounds like a high school assignment. It needs to be replaced with serious analysis, rather than talk about 'the theme of Individual vs. Society'. Good playwrights do not write plays with 'themes', they create characters, situations and dialogue which can suggest extraneous themes. Good criticism rarely refers to 'themes', which more often than not signify dumbed-down reductionism on the interpreter's part.--165.228.138.234 06:24, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copy of website

Check it out: http://ib11english.tripod.com/id8.html

Doesn't that invalidate sources? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.207.141.52 (talk) 06:11, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NOT TRILOGY

It,s the fourth or fifth time I find that Lorca wrote a trilogy of rural plays and that,s not true. La casa de Bernarda Alba it,s an independant play. Bodas de Sangre and Yerma are part of a not-finished "trilogy of Spanish earth", wich third play "La destruccion de Sodoma" (The fell of Sodoma) was not written because of Lorca,s death. I,d like someone to correct this. Paitxa —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.2.255.244 (talk) 11:49, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Symbolism section

The symbolism section has a single vague, unreferenced sentence followed by a rather sizable quotation with no context. I'm removing it for now, because it serves no purpose in the article. Jfmantis (talk) 01:27, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested moves 12 December 2014

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: consensus to move the pages, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 00:56, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

– I'd like to make this article the primary topic for the title "Blood Wedding." Pageview statistics support it, and it's also a very significant work, which is not true of the other topics of this title. It has far more views than any other article containing "Blood Wedding" in the title, and while it has fewer views than "St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre", which is occasionally referred to as a "blood wedding", this is not the common name of the event.

Here are the page view stats from November:

St. Bartholomew's Day massacre: 19303, but this is not the common/primary name of the topic, nor is it well-known or used often
Blood Wedding (play): 4838
Ruse blood wedding: 117
Blood Wedding (1941 film): 81
Blood Wedding (1977 film): 109
Blood Wedding (1981 film): 535
Bluthochzeit: 134

As you can see, omitting St. Bartholomew's Day, the Lorca play has nine times the views of the second most viewed topic on the page, about six times as many views as all other topics combined, and over forty times as many views as most of the topics. Additionally, two of the other articles are about works based on this play. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:27, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Seems like a straightforward case of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. —BarrelProof (talk) 00:41, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
But how often is it called "the Blood Wedding" rather than the direct name "St. Bartholomew's Day massacre" or similar? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:41, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- One seemingly strong indication is that the term "Blood Wedding" does not appear in the article at St. Bartholomew's Day massacre. Just to make sure, I also checked the state of that article at the end of 2013 and at the end of 2012. It wasn't in those versions either. —BarrelProof (talk) 22:47, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support one of the better known plays of an important writer. PatGallacher (talk) 19:17, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. bd2412 T 03:30, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blood Wedding. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111121065354/http://www.spainisculture.com:80/en/obras_de_excelencia/bodas_de_sangre_de_federico_garcia_lorca.html to http://www.spainisculture.com/en/obras_de_excelencia/bodas_de_sangre_de_federico_garcia_lorca.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:39, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

I removed a large section of text copied from here. The text was added 28 September 2011 and the oldest archive of the source is dated 25 April 2012. However, an editor did mention the apparent copyvio on this page in November 2011, and the section had the same non-Wikipedia-style paragraph indentation as the source, leading me to believe that this is indeed a copyvio. –dlthewave ☎ 19:09, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]