Talk:Closure temperature

From "Blocking Temperature" talk page; moved here after merge

Move to Wiktionary

Opposed: The article was a definition, not an article. However, there is much which can be said about the topic. For now I have copied material from radiometric dating, as a basis for expaning the article. Babakathy (talk) 01:10, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opposed: Agree with Babakathy. At the very least it should be possible to include a table of mineral v. isotope system showing the various blocking temperatures and maybe some examples of how the study of several minerals and isotope systems from a single locality can give a lot of detail about its cooling (and therefore arguably tectonic) history. More than enough for reasonable size article IMO. Mikenorton (talk) 11:38, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

Closure temperature and blocking temperature are the same thing. I will merge. I propose closure temperature to be the one to be saved because that's the phrase I've always heard and used in geology, but other opinions will be appreciated. Awickert (talk) 05:22, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No opinions in a month an a half; merging. Awickert (talk) 00:20, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Closure temperature. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090108223738/http://www2.wwnorton.com/college/geo/earth2/glossary/b.htm to http://www.wwnorton.com/college/geo/earth2/glossary/b.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]