Talk:Blah
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Blah Blah Blah (song))
This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Another film
[edit]The King of the Bla Bla Bla
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:28, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Blah (disambiguation) → Blah — Blah is currently a soft redir to Wiktionary. This dab page can do the same thing since it has the {{wikt}} box to link to the Wiktionary entry. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 23:14, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Survey
[edit]- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''
or*'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with~~~~
. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
- Comment, this is a useless dab page anyway. If WP:MOSDAB were applied properly, most of the articles on it wouldn't even be here. Only 2 of the entries could be commonly referred to as just "Blah", the political party and Moses Zeh Blah. "Bla" and "Blaa" shouldn't be on here either. 90.219.50.171 (talk) 02:02, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support if there is a dab page, it should reside at the primary location instead of any soft redirect to wiktionary. If there is a soft redirect to wiktionary, I think it should always try to be converted into a dab page. 65.94.253.16 (talk) 04:29, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support. older ≠ wiser 23:59, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support move but I also concur that it seems questionable whether the disambiguation page is necessary. But putting the "soft redirect" at the primary topic is silly -- an encyclopedia is not a dictionary and should not be expected to offer information on every single usage of every single word. Propaniac (talk) 17:23, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]- Any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Editing
[edit]It won't let me edit anything
Scar4151 (talk) 14:40, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
This is because the article was vandalized. Please see Wikipedia:Vandalism for more details. Hope that helps. (For 1 year, the user does not have a response.) 98.230.2.23 (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 17 May 2021
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
- Note: Protected by Anthony Appleyard on 2011-03-26: "Persistent vandalism" ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:19, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Question
[edit]Why this protected 68.126.204.92 (talk) 23:25, 17 May 2021 (UTC)