Talk:BITS Pilani/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 20:37, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While this article isn't too bad, it is still a long way from GA status. Here are the issues I found:

~~There are multiple citation needed tags that need to be addressed.~~ DonePratik.mallya (talk) 21:00, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
~~Nearly all the references are bare urls; titles, dates, publishers, accessdates, etc. need to be added to them.~~ DonePratik.mallya (talk) 21:00, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
~~I tagged the article with a copyedit tag; there are a lot of sentences that need to be cleaned up, on a skim read I saw at least 10.~~ DonePratik.mallya (talk) 21:00, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Due to the multiple problems with refs, grammar, and sentence structure, I'm failing this article as a GA nom. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 20:48, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have significantly improved the article; however, perhaps a reordering of images/ better layout is required before it can be renominated? Pratik.mallya (talk) 21:00, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
oh yeah! I saw the article on iitkgp and its much more aesthetic. We need to do more work. Any help would be appreciated. Pratik.mallya (talk) 21:23, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]