Jump to content

Talk:Bingo! (AKB48 song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Bingo! (song))

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Bingo! (AKB48 song). There is a consensus here both to retain the exclamation point and to add the artist's name as a disambiguating term. Xoloz (talk) 02:34, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Bingo! (song)Bingo (AKB48 song)Bingo lists Bingo (Gucci Mane song) and 8 others. A "!" doesn't provide sufficient WP:CRITERIA recognizability for those looking for the Japanese song or indeed looking for any of the English ones, particularly since the word "Bingo" id accompanied by an exclamation mark in its most common uses (in games of bingo).
Note that an almost identical set of issues arose at Talk:So Long (AKB48 song)#Requested_move (proposed by by In ictu oculi, whose rationale I have copied and embellished here), where there was unanimous support for renaming. After I closed it as "move", I was asked to move this one. I initially declined, and suggested an RM discussion, but later decided that was un-neeedd bureaucracy, and moved it. That move was reverted by another editor, who believes that since if an exclamation mark is insufficient disambiguation, there should be a rule specifying that. I disagree; WP:NOTBURO, and we don't need to codify every nuance. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:22, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose. The title has an exclamation mark. It is incorrect to drop it.
Also, there have been similar discussions that ended differently. For example:
I think it is unfair to continue with these moves (with inconsistent results) until there has been a thorough discussion about disambiguating titles with punctuation marks. Until there is some sort of Wikipedia rule/guideline about that.
The reason result of RMs are different is that print sources exist for most English song cases. But for most Japanese and Korean songs there are few print sources. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:58, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
User:Moscow Connection, I fully agree with you, I'm fully in favor of keeping "!" "..." "?" in all cases. The "!" etc. provides help for some users and harms no one. I think the idea (of another editor) was that disambiguation demands identical punctuation so "!" must be stripped, but no evidence was provided of this nor is there anything in WP:DAB or any guideline saying this. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:19, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I have filed a new move request for "Want!" too. Here: Talk:Want (Berryz Kobo song)#Requested move 2. --Moscow Connection (talk) 03:06, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Goodo, have been there and supported. There doesn't need to be any conflict between both providing name of artist, and providing exact punctuation; it isn't an either/or and it's good to see a consensus emerging on this. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:21, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bingo! (AKB48 song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:35, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]