Talk:Flight review

On 25 November 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Biennial flight review to Flight Review. The result of the discussion was moved.

Pilot/aviator

By legacy, Pilot is a disambig page, and the topic of aircraft pilot is found at Aviator. But that topic title is a little hokey, as it makes me think of the early-20th-century ideal of the heroic barnstomer (it has acquired a collection of other topics over time, so it's a bit of a mess). I'm not sure how one could make a fresh start on this web of connections though. David Brooks 01:46, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'd finally noticed that editing another article. I'm not sure exactly how to go about disentagling the mess, but I am hoping to fill in an article on pilot-in-command in the near future. McNeight 02:17, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 25 November 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Clear consensus to move to Flight review (lowercase). (closed by non-admin page mover) echidnaLives - talk - edits 08:17, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Biennial flight review → Flight Review – This article starts off by immediately stating that Biennial Flight Review is the old name for what is now simply called a Flight Review, based on "§ 61.56 Flight review". So for that reason, I would suggest this page be moved to Flight Review instead and have Biennial Flight Review redirect there, rather than the other way around. DanDawson (talk) 02:49, 25 November 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. ‡ The Night Watch ω (talk) 05:56, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support given the the above and doing some additional searches seeing what recent's recently been used, a smattering of just "biennial", a big chunk of "Fight review, formally called ..." (or the reverse), and a decent chunk of just "flight review". But note, I believe it should be Flight review, lower case "review". Skynxnex (talk) 21:46, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Lowercase for "review", please. This is not a proper noun. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 06:34, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Change and lowercase to Flight review: The official phrase has changed, the article is not just about the US usage, and there's no need for capitalization. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 22:06, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Change and lowercase to Flight review: No need to cap before. No need to cap now. Cinderella157 (talk) 23:24, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Change and lowercase to Flight review. Even the source the nom quotes uses lower case. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 00:09, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Change and lowercase to Flight review as per SMcCandlish~T P W 17:15, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.