Talk:Bicester Village railway station

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

"Smaller of the two"

Seeing as Bicester Town / Village is now a big two-platform station with a proper building, I'm not sure smaller of the two stations still applies. Tom walker (talk) 16:16, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- It is still currently the station with the least services and amount of destinations so in this case it is still the smaller of the two. Simply south ...... time, deparment skies for just 9 years 23:55, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 25 October 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. The consensus is that the station has just been renamed, not that it is a new station. Jenks24 (talk) 05:08, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bicester Town railway station → Bicester Village railway station – The station has been renamed to Bicester Village railway station. [1] Commyguy (talk) 14:57, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom, but considering the problems we've had at St Pancras railway station, this may not be as obvious a move as it seems. Tevildo (talk) 22:23, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The new station is relocated from the old one so it's more a case that Town station closed in 2014 and Village station opened in 2015. Crookesmoor (talk) 09:53, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Whether that is the case or not, it was improper for you to pre-empt the outcome of this discussion. I have reverted your edits to both pages. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:13, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The station has not closed and it has not been relocated. It has been rebuilt and has reopened under a new name but with it's former station code meaning it is the same station. The original plans didn't include a name change however Chiltern Railways voted to change the name whilst reconstruction was underway earlier this year. [2] [3] [4] Commyguy (talk) 10:24, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - clear case and I have proposed a histmerge anyway. Simply south ...... time, deparment skies for just 9 years 16:31, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No need for a histmerge, since nothing of any importance was added to either page after the copypaste - just the merge templates and an unnecessary hatnote that was both malformed and misplaced. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:13, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I will still say same rebuilt station. Simply south ...... time, deparment skies for just 9 years 22:13, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't say it wasn't the same station. What I said was that the content added to Bicester Village railway station did not expand upon the content in Bicester Town railway station and so no preservation of history is necessary. Indeed, merging the histories would be detrimental since both pages have been edited in parallel and so two consecutive versions would look rather strange as a normal diff. See WP:HISTMERGE#Parallel versions. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:50, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't saying you weren't. I was just listing my support reasion although I guess I should have been clearer. Simply south ...... time, deparment skies for just 9 years 23:52, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - per the linked BBC article it's the same station location with a new name. Mackensen (talk) 21:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Bicester Village railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:30, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Usage 2014/15

Could someone with access to the data check this figure? It doesn't look right. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 11:10, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's right. The line was closed for much of 2014/2015. You can check for yourself here www.orr.gov.uk/statistics/published-stats/station-usage-estimates Ingafube (talk) 11:18, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bicester Village railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bicesterlink.info/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090828064814/http://www.chiltern-evergreen3.co.uk/ to http://www.chiltern-evergreen3.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:57, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]