Talk:Bessas (magister militum)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 05:10, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

I'll get to this this weekend.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 05:10, 15 September 2012 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   This is awkward: active especially under Justinian I Perhaps, "primarily active under Justinian I"? Who are Gadar and Yazdegerd? Are they notable? This is also awkward: Nothing more is heard of him Perhaps "Nothing more is known about him"?

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Hello Sturmvogel and thanks for the review! I've implemented the suggested changes. Cheers, Constantine ✍ 09:59, 20 September 2012 (UTC)