Talk:Bertrade of Montfort

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sources culled

Sources must be cited with exact referent. So I've removed these citations which require readers to skim thousand page works to find one phrase. Wjhonson (talk) 20:31, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that was a WP:POINTy mistake. No source is not in any way better than some source, unless you have a reason to think any were actually lied about. Any future editor who sees this is warmly welcomed to restore those mistakenly removed sources, although of course exact pages are always preferable. — LlywelynII 03:19, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for future expansion

There's obviously more in the edition of Orderic provided, which should be used in combination with modern scholarship. There's also more at

Freeman, Edward A. (1882), The Reign of William Rufus, vol. I, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

— LlywelynII 03:19, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]