Talk:B. B. Warfield

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Christianity: Reformed Christianity Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Reformed Christianity portal This article is supported by WikiProject Reformed Christianity (assessed as Mid-importance).

Asa Mahan

In my latest edits to the section Studies in Religious Experience, I made a link to Asa Mahan (1800-1889). He was the first president of Oberlin College (1835-1850). As yet, there is no Wikipedia article on him. DFH 14:59, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Needs work

This article has a few problems, most notably some para-POV phrasing (not too bad, though). There are also some grammatical aberrations. --Whiteknox 15:00, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Assorted to-do's

In the following quotation, the meaning of "churchmanship" needs to be explained.--Whiteknox 22:44, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unlike his contemporaries at Princeton, and perhaps due to his invalid wife, Warfield never cared much for churchmanship.

References

It is very difficult to find good historical information on Warfield. Unfortunately there are no biographies of Warfield; I was interested to discover the PhD. theses cited at the end of this article. There is a biographical sketch included at the beginning of the ten-volume "The Works of Benjamin B. Warfield" published by Oxford University Press which I am relying on heavily for edits made to this page. --Whiteknox 20:15, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. As long as you're doing it, be sure to cite your sources. --Fl e x (talk|contribs) 12:25, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Change name of section

The section "Early life" should be changed, perhaps to "Lineage and early life", in my opinion. It mostly covers notable ancestors and relatives. Perhaps another section should be created for the descendants of Warfield which are mentioned in this section. Does anybody else agree? --Whiteknox 15:14, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Be bold, and make it so! --Fl e x (talk|contribs) 12:25, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't like to make changes unless someone else agrees with me, especially because I am fairly new to Wikipedia and haven't had a great deal of time to read over all of the policies. I guess that kind of contradicts WP:BOLD, though. --Whiteknox 19:06, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Darwinism section is not entirely accurate

The following is written under the "Darwinism" section:

Warfield had an unusual view of Darwinism for a conservative in his day.

Many conservative theologians of the time (including Charles and A. A. Hodge, Cyrus Scofield, and William Jennings Bryan) were not six-day creationists. I can't remember if any of those were theistic evolutionists, but I do know that six-day creationism was very rare. Not until Henry Morris and ICR did six-day creationism revive. I don't think that theistic evolutionism was a rare opinion for conservatives in that day. --Whiteknox 15:20, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not disagreeing with you, but I'd like to see some reliable source(s) cited on this point. --Fl e x (talk|contribs) 12:25, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reference added and section reworded. Whiteknox is quite right. Darwin had more trouble with fellow scientists than Victorian Christianity. 84.92.241.186 (talk) 17:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More on Darwinism

An anon added this to the article, but it should have been placed here:

This section doesn't quite seem to match up with Warfield's own explanation of his views on the subject. Although one could argue he believed in the possibility of some type of evolution, it wasn't Darwin's, and it couldn't apply to humans. Strongly suggest this be revised or stricken.207.140.171.5

My response: Please be bold and revise it. Supplying some reliable sources for the revisions would make it more likely that your changes would stick. --Flex (talk|contribs) 13:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For a thorough examination of Warfield's position on this subject, please refer to the detailed coverage in Fred G. Zaspel's recent book, (I just added the reference in the Further Reading section). This supplies sufficient knowledge to equip anyone with the wherewithal to correct the section on Evolution. (Sorry - I don't have time for this right now, else I would do it myself). DFH (talk) 20:23, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I should add that the main problem with the section on Evolution is that it makes no distinction between Warfield's views as a young man, and his later views as a mature theologian with a lifetime of engagement in the field of polemics. The fact that he changed his mind about Darwinism is of such significance that it should not be ignored in this Wikipedia article. DFH (talk) 20:36, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on B. B. Warfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:31, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on B. B. Warfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091203112055/http://www.bibleteacher.org/BBW3.htm to http://www.bibleteacher.org/BBW3.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:11, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]