Jump to content

Talk:Battle of Zabadani (2012)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

File:A funeral for some of the martyrs of Zabadani.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:A funeral for some of the martyrs of Zabadani.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:A funeral for some of the martyrs of Zabadani.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:40, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

POV pushing

[edit]

A user is trying very hard to change the outcome of the battle from a Syrian Army to a rebel victory based on a source saying that Zabadani is cut off by the army. This is POV pushing, original search and unsourced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AsNero444 (talk • contribs) 04:37, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Sourced. Its not original research, its just a fact. Not POV pushing either. Also you are a sockpuppet of ChronicalUsual. http://news.yahoo.com/syrian-clashes-spill-across-lebanon-100504360.html Sopher99 (talk) 04:38, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely unsourced. Your additions are:

1) Battle ongoing ===> Unsourced , some people are reported killed? Not enough to say battle reopened 2) FSA victory ===> Unsourced 3) Army repuslsed from the city? Unsourced, original search

You have 0 source and just a baseless accusation to throw at me for justify your POV pushing. You seem desperate to create a "FSA victory" because what happen in reality is not making you happy. Unforutenately, Wikipedia is not your fantasm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AsNero444 (talk • contribs) 04:42, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I never said FSA victory. Also www.firstpost.com/topic/place/syria-syria-zabadani-and-madaya-surrounded-cut-off-starved-by-video-X2b8BbwvjhE-15-1.html Sopher99 (talk) 04:44, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The video shows the army in the city and you are basing your claims on this video and on the little text aside saying that the cities are sealed off to write that the army has been repulsed from the city and that the battle is ongoing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AsNero444 (talk • contribs) 04:50, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hezbollah involvement in fighting

[edit]

The Times article at the end clearly states that according to Syrian ally Iran that Hezbollah was involved in the combat in Zabadani:

"Al-Arabiya television quoted a top Iranian Revolutionary Guard official this week as saying that Hezbollah forces took part in recent fighting in Zabadani near Damascus, which had been taken over by the Free Syrian Army"

The quote above is quite clear and therefore Hezbollah has been reincluded as a combatant in the fighting in Zabadani. Guest2625 (talk) 03:51, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

unless hezbollah themselves say they are involved in this battle we cant take the word of Iranian guards and until other sources like press tv picks it up not just al arabiya this info is not to be taken seriously. al arabiyah can not have news about hezbollah that press tv has missed out on so either the officials words were taken out of context or this is another media lie Baboon43 (talk) 02:27, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand your reasoning that Hezbollah can't be a combatant unless they admit they were a combatant. If this were a criteria for including combatants in battles then truth could simply be denied by having a belligerent claim they weren't involved in a fight even though reliable sources say otherwise. That Hezbollah was involved in the battle is backed up quite clearly by reliable sources. The truth simply cannot be denied because one party to the conflict wants to change reality to their liking. Guest2625 (talk) 06:21, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Time for an update?

[edit]

As of today, July 7, 2015, the Heroes of Hezbollah and Syrian Arab Army have liberated Zabadani and are cleansing it from terrorist remnants, so an update is maybe in order... 212.181.160.22 (talk) 23:26, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Battle of Zabadani (2012). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Zabadani (2012). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:08, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Battle of Zabadani" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Battle of Zabadani. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 25#Battle of Zabadani until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:52, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Battle_of_Zabadani_(2012)&oldid=1199652649"