Talk:Battle of White Marsh/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:09, 27 October 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
You mention Light Infantry battalions and such. If these were were brigaded together from the light companies of different battalions, please say so in a note. Also, without a designation they should not be capitalized.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

I'll review this tomorrow.

Capitalization fixed. I hadn't noticed anything in the sources that said that about the infantry battalions. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 14:36, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Curious omission since I'm not aware that the Brits had any light infantry regiments organized this early. But if it's not mentioned in your sources that's fine.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:48, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]