Talk:Battle of Nacogdoches

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Texas Revolution

Why is the Battle of Nacogdoches not considered part of the Texas Revolution?Inkan1969 (talk) 20:01, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This was an isolated uprising several years prior to the general rebellion that become the Texas Revolution. It certainly forms part of the historical context in which the Revolution occurred, but most people wouldn't call it a part of the Revolution; that would be sort of like saying that John Brown's raid on Harpers Ferry was a battle in the American Civil War. -Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 14:14, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]