Talk:Battle of Hab

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Crusades task force.

Military history: Medieval / Crusades C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)
	Crusades task force

Result

Should this not just be "crusader victory"? At the moment the article implies that the Frankish losses were not worth the victory, but the operation saved the Northern states. The Islamic forces even had to withdraw because their losses were just as serious. Could we change this result? --Tefalstar (talk) 17:59, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to agree. Ilghazi rode back to Aleppo claiming it was a victory to save face. If it was a victory, he would have marched on to Antioch. That is not really grounds for calling it a disputed victory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.14.160.191 (talk) 02:08, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]