Talk:Siege of Exeter (1068)

	Anglo-Saxon England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Devon Low‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cornwall Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:

Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!

Military history: British / European B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Article title

Would this article not be better as "Siege of Exeter (1068)"? All the information I've seen suggests that it was essentially a lengthy siege, followed by surrender, rather than a battle as I understand that term. More information here. Rather than moving it myself, I thought I'd see what others think. Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:04, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably the title should match the name by which this conflict is most commonly known. I don't know offhand what that is, but I did put the disambiguation page in place which lists this as a siege and provides a redirect.Metabaronic (talk) 21:30, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There was a seige by William in 1068. The English yielded. In late 1069 (at the same time as the seige of Shrewsbury), the Cornish and Devonians laid seige to Exeter now loyal to William. A sally forced the rebels into the path of a Norman army led by William FitzOsbern and Brian of Brittany who slaughtered them. These two events are quite seperate, but which is the Battle of Exeter? Alansplodge (talk) 23:43, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The best of the three refs seems to be the Bradbury one, which calls it the "Siege of Exeter" and refers to the 1069 event as a "local rising". I'll be bold and move it. Ghmyrtle (talk) 22:24, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Events of 1069

After editing a lot of the main body of the article, I removed a small paragraph about subsequent conflict centered on Exeter the following year. This small paragraph didn't explain events particularly clearly and suffered from a lack of references. From what I've managed to gather from a number of internet sources and stuff from Google Books...

Another rebellion arose in the country surrounding Exeter
The people of the city did NOT take part in the rebellion
Exeter came briefly under siege by the rebels
The Norman garrison of Exeter sallied from the city and crushed the rebels between them and the arriving forces of Brian of Brittany and William FitzOsbern, 1st Earl of Hereford (I think it was those two)

I welcome anyone with access to sufficient source material to come and re-write a clear description of these events. I suggest under a new section. Willknowsalmosteverything (talk) 21:48, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]