Talk:Bartholomew School

The current logo is temporary, until someone can find a replacement for it. Samx 16:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Just to clear it up, this is a school page, and it will be vandalised, however I suspect most people do so from the comfort of their homes. The school itself has been blocked from vandalising.Samx 20:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References

Just tidied up the references, they now function. I had to remove the reference following "In 2003, the school became a specialist technology college where design and technology is made compulsory for GCSE." as the document no longer existed, so if anyone has another reference to replace this please do be bold! Firetrap (talk • contribs) 16:13, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bartschooleynsham.JPG

Image:Bartschooleynsham.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:46, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW This has been done on the image in question. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 19:10, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alumni

Are these red-linked alumni really worth a section? It's a bit embarassing, shouldn't they (if deemed notable enough) be incorporated into the article elsewhere? 137.205.17.89 (talk) 13:34, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to remove them. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 19:05, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]