Jump to content

Talk:Abbasid dynasty

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Banu Abbas)

Requested move 29 September 2020

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 01:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Banu AbbasAbbasid dynasty – Per WP:ENG and common usage, similar to analogous cases with the Umayyad dynasty (Banu Umayya), Mirdasid dynasty (Banu Mirdas), etc. The family is specifically notable as a caliphal dynasty rather than as a 'mere' Arab clan or tribe. Constantine 16:40, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

İslamiyat

[edit]

How Abbasid dynasty founded 39.44.141.189 (talk) 10:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to family tree

[edit]

Since August there have been some 110 consecutive edits (so far) to the family tree chart ([1]). I'm assuming these are good-faith revisions, but no explanations or edit summaries have been provided by the IP user(s) doing this. I see that GoldRingChip reverted the latest edits, explaining that there were template errors, but the IP is now edit-warring ([2], [3]). The IP user should explain themselves here before edit-warring, and it might help if they explained the overall edits they've been making since August.

Also, as a general note: the family tree section does not cite any sources, which raises WP:V and WP:OR concerns. It was originally added in 2022 by Lord MAKR Master ([4]). It would help if they could explain what sources they used to verify the information in this chart. (And perhaps they could also check if the recent edits look alright?) Thanks, R Prazeres (talk) 22:00, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]