Talk:Bengaluru Underworld

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Karnataka / Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Requested move 17 January 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Page moved. Contrary to the RM initiator, opposition did not demonstrate the common name. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jerm (talk) 22:38, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bangalore Underworld → Bengaluru Underworld – Official name as shown by CBFC certificate on trailer. The Times of India review uses the same name. DareshMohan (talk) 07:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

— Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 21:44, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose move. Request does not take WP:COMMONNAME into account. O.N.R. ^(talk) 05:52, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support We're not dealing with with a ton of English language coverage, but among the coverage that exists the proposed name appears to be common. When the common name and the official name are the same, there's little reason it shouldn't be our page title.--Yaksar (let's chat) 16:24, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support More sources seem to use the proposed spelling. City's common name does not necessarily corelate with the film's common name. -- Ab207 (talk) 14:07, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.