Talk:Bambra (surname)

Anthroponymy Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 11 February 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: pages moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 04:18, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bambra → Bambra (surname)
Bambra, Victoria → Bambra

– It surprises me that the second page was not moved to this title before this SIA's creation per WP:PRECISION. The location in Australia more likely appears to be WP:PRIMARY. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 04:02, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Seems like there was no need to disambiguate the locality before the second page was created (just a few hours ago). Even though the locality is small and the article gets little traffic, I still feel it should have priority over such a short surname list. PC78 (talk) 07:37, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Per PC78, although Australian places appear to include the state for reasons other than disambiguation, it seems its more likely than a surname with only 2 people (which wasn't even a valid article until I added content). Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:46, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support for reasons stated above. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:05, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.